Malpede's play is laced with darkness and humor, even in the double meaning of the word «whether» in the title — which I found nicely reflects the deep uncertainty that still surrounds the worst - case outcomes from
the continuing buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
Not exact matches
-- A new post on ClimateEthics.org argues, as others have before, for another uncomfortable reality: Complacency is not an ethical response to the persistent uncertainty clouding forecasts
of harmful impacts from the
continuing buildup of human - generated
greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere.
A new post on ClimateEthics.org argues, «Complacency is not an ethical response to the persistent uncertainty clouding forecasts
of harmful impacts from the
continuing buildup of human - generated
greenhouse gases in the
atmosphere.»
We agree with Al Gore, James Hansen and the overwhelming majority
of climate scientists that the
continued buildup of greenhouse gases in Earth's
atmosphere portends worldwide cataclysmic change
in the very near future.