The crucial point to note here is that, according to point 5, any transitional arrangement in which a time - limited prolongation of the Union acquis is envisaged would necessarily result in the continued payment by the UK into the EU budget for the duration of that arrangement, along with the continued applicability of EU law in the UK and with
it the continued jurisdiction of the Court of Justice.
Any enforcement of the post adoption contact agreement must be under
the continuing jurisdiction of the court granting the petition of adoption.
Not exact matches
Accordingly, the parties agrees that Parent shall be entitled to injunctive relief in the event
of a breach
of this Section 4.3, including an injunction to prevent any
continuing breach or violation
of the provisions
of this Section 4.3, and the remedy
of specific performance to enforce specifically the terms and provisions this Section 4.3 in any
court of the United States or any state having
jurisdiction.
If for any reason a
court of competent
jurisdiction finds any provision or portion
of these Terms
of Service to be unenforceable, the remainder
of these Terms
of Service will
continue in full force and effect.
If any provision
of these terms and conditions is found by any
court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, the invalidity
of that provision will not affect the validity
of the remaining provisions which shall
continue to have full force and effect.
If any provision
of these Terms is, for any reason, invalid and / or unenforceable, as determined in an appropriate
Court of proper
jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall
continue to be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Kareem argued that, going by numerous judicial authorities, some
of which he cited on Wednesday, the development implied that Justice Tsoho's
court had been robbed of jurisdiction to continue to conduct proceedings in the case until the Court of Appeal determined the fresh motion for stay befor
court had been robbed
of jurisdiction to
continue to conduct proceedings in the case until the
Court of Appeal determined the fresh motion for stay befor
Court of Appeal determined the fresh motion for stay before it.
The
court held that the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) could
continue with the conduct
of its supplementary election in the state slated for tomorrow owing to its submission that only the election petition tribunal had the
jurisdiction to hear the cases before it.
He
continued, «this special
jurisdiction was not meant to usurp or replace the
jurisdiction of the lower
courts».
«On the grounds
of lack
of jurisdiction», he
continued, «I think the Applicant has not satisfied this
court that the high court judge committed any jurisdictional error to warrant the intervention of the Supreme C
court that the high
court judge committed any jurisdictional error to warrant the intervention of the Supreme C
court judge committed any jurisdictional error to warrant the intervention
of the Supreme
CourtCourt.
Intelligence - sharing would be «conditioned on Denmark's
continued membership
of the European Union and... on Denmark's agreement to the application
of the
jurisdiction of the
court of justice
of the EU», the statement said.
The group wondered why a
court of competent
jurisdiction would order the release
of Ubah yet the Department
of State Services would
continue to hold him.
If any provision
of these terms is determined by a
Court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable in whole or in part, the validity and the enforceability
of the remainder
of the provision in question and
of the remaining provisions
of these terms shall be separate and several and construed and enforceable accordingly and shall
continue in full force and effect.
International High School attorney Brooke Duncan issued this statement: «We
continue to maintain that IHSNO as a charter school is not subject to
jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act, as the acting chair
of the National Labor Relations Board made clear in his dissent, and we expect the
courts will eventually decide the issue.»
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to
continue in attendance at a public college by reason
of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers
of such complaint are unable, in his judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings for relief and that the institution
of an action will materially further the orderly achievement
of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice
of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute for or in the name
of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district
court of the United States against such parties and for such relief as may be appropriate, and such
court shall have and shall exercise
jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or
court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation
of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power
of the
court to insure compliance with constitutional standards.
... any county with a population
of 200,000 or more may regulate or prohibit the running at large
of dogs within said county, and cause such dogs as may be running at large to be impounded... Any person, firm or corporation who violates any rule or regulation... shall be guilty
of a misdemeanor and shall be punished as provided by the laws
of this state in any
court of competent
jurisdiction, provided that in the case
of continuing offenses, each day on which the offense occurs shall constitute a separate offense.
If any provision
of these Terms
of Use is held by a
court or other tribunal
of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions
of the Terms
of Use will
continue in full force and effect.
If any provision
of these Terms
of Use is held by a
court or other tribunal
of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable for any reason, such provision shall be eliminated or limited to the minimum extent such that the remaining provisions
of the Terms
of Use will
continue in full force and effect.
In written reasons, the
Court of Appeal agreed the appellant was a vexatious litigant; had caused a public nuisance; that the AG had standing to seek an injunction to prevent the public nuisance from continuing; that the court had inherent jurisdiction to control its own process; and that the activities of the appellant interfered with the administration of jus
Court of Appeal agreed the appellant was a vexatious litigant; had caused a public nuisance; that the AG had standing to seek an injunction to prevent the public nuisance from
continuing; that the
court had inherent jurisdiction to control its own process; and that the activities of the appellant interfered with the administration of jus
court had inherent
jurisdiction to control its own process; and that the activities
of the appellant interfered with the administration
of justice.
In summary, these provide that the
court which has primary
jurisdiction is the one for the place where the parties last lived together as husband and wife, assuming that one
of them has
continued to live there for the past 12 months.
If Pennsylvania declines
jurisdiction, the family
court shall request Pennsylvania issue an order finding it no longer retains exclusive,
continuing jurisdiction Pennsylvania
Courts do not have
jurisdiction over the matter
of custody
of this minor child.
These are that: (i) the
jurisdiction is to be invoked and exercised exceptionally and with great caution; (ii) there must certainly be something more than mere infringement
of the criminal law before the assistance
of civil proceedings can be invoked and accorded for the protection or promotion
of the interests
of the inhabitants
of the area; (iii) the essential foundation for the exercise
of the
court's discretion to grant an injunction is not that the off ender is deliberately and flagrantly flouting the law, but the need to draw the inference that the defendant's unlawful operations will
continue unless and until effectively restrained by the law and that nothing short
of an injunction will be eff ective to restrain them.
The Small Claims
Court will
continue to have the
jurisdiction to hear cases involving claims for debt, damage, recovery
of personal property and specific performance
of agreements.
A person who has a claim in excess
of the
Court's monetary
jurisdiction, not including interest and expenses, will
continue to have the option
of abandoning part
of the claim so that the balance can be heard by the
Court.
Whilst it seems likely that the
Courts of many EU Member States would generally
continue to recognise English
jurisdiction clauses, in the absence
of a unifying instrument the approaches taken by different EU Member States would almost inevitably be different and quite probably inconsistent.
Ordinarily, the
court will
continue to have
jurisdiction to modify its support order in the event
of a change in circumstances.
It is incompatible with Council Regulation No 44 / 2001 / EC (
jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement
of judgments in civil and commercial matters) for a
court of a member state to make an order to restrain a person from commencing or
continuing proceedings before the
courts of another member state on the ground that such proceedings would be contrary to an arbitration agreement.
Advise them that they are not permitted by law to
continue to contact you about the alleged debt or to refer the matter to a debt collector or credit reporting agency unless and until they prove the debt in a
court of competent
jurisdiction.
See Moseley [v. Mosier, 279 S.C. 348, 351, 306 S.E. 2d 624, 626 (1983)-RSB-(«[F] amily
courts have
continuing jurisdiction to do whatever is in the best interests
of the child regardless
of what the separation agreement specifies.»).
The
court granted mother's motion to dismiss finding that it was appropriate for the
court to decline
continuing jurisdiction over this matter because mother and the children no longer had a significant connection with the State
of New Hampshire.
In that respect, s. 31
of the FLA confirms the
court's
continuing (but now statutory)
jurisdiction to make declarations
of parentage:
As a matter
of first impression, the New Hampshire Supreme
Court held that under the Uniform Child Custody
Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) New Hampshire had continuing exclusive jurisdiction to deal with the post-divorce parent
Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) New Hampshire had
continuing exclusive
jurisdiction to deal with the post-divorce parent
jurisdiction to deal with the post-divorce parenting matters.
OTTAWA — The B.C. government has asked the
courts whether it has the
jurisdiction to regulate the transport
of oil through the province, a central question in the
continuing political fight over the controversial Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.
The
court therefore found that because the claimant was suffering a
continuing financial loss within this country, it could exercise its discretion to allow service out
of the
jurisdiction.
The
court does have federal question
jurisdiction because Casemaker
continues to threaten to sue Fastcase for copyright infringement if it updates the Georgia regulations from the Georgia Secretary
of State website.
Among other things: successfully obtaining the continuation
of a US $ 2 billion freezing order under s. 25
of the Civil
Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 in support
of Russian proceedings; and successfully acting on an ex parte appeal against a Judge's refusal to grant a Chabra freezing order — the Order was granted by the
Court of Appeal and
continued on the return date (with Stephen Smith QC and Ben Griffiths).
Provides regardless where a
court temporarily sits, the
court would
continue to preside on behalf
of its original
jurisdiction (i.e. judicial department, judicial district, county, city, etc.) and the same substantive and procedural laws (e.g. governing venue, jury selection, papers and appeals) would apply as if the
court were not relocated.
Where a child moves lawfully from one Member State to another and acquires a new habitual residence there, the
courts of the Member State
of the child's former habitual residence shall, by way
of exception to Article 8, retain
jurisdiction during a three - month period following the move for the purpose
of modifying a judgment on access rights issued in that Member State before the child moved, where the holder
of access rights pursuant to the judgment on access rights
continues to have his or her habitual residence in the Member State
of the child's former habitual residence.
The
Court of Appeal disagreed with the tenants and the Attorney General, finding that s. 31
of the Sechelt Indian Band Self - Government Act «can only have been intended to preserve the character
of the Sechelt Lands as reserve lands subject to federal
jurisdiction» and that the lands
continued, as they were before self - government, as lands reserved for Indians under s. 91 (24)
of the Constitution.
The arbitral proceedings may
continue, and an award may be granted, at the same time that an application to the
court for the determination
of a preliminary point
of jurisdiction is pending (section 32 (4)-RRB-.
62 «Taking an AXA to Acts
of the Scottish Parliament» [2010] 15 J.R. 163 «Towards a Codified Constitution» (2010) Justice Journal 74 (co-author) «Procuring the End
of the Promptness Requirement» [2010] 29 C.J.Q. 297 «Practice and Procedure in the New Supreme
Court» [2010] 15 J.R. 1 «Anti-Suit Injunctions and Non-Exclusive
Jurisdiction Clauses» [2010] 69 C.L.J. 25 «Contracting Out
of Homelessness Functions» [2009] 14 J.R. 333 «The Permission Stage and Subsequent Use
of Disclosed Material» [2009] 14 J.R. 249 «Arbitration and Litigation after West Tankers» [2009] L.M.C.L.Q. 285 «Bi-Polar Sovereignty Restated» [2009] 68 C.L.J. 361 «Promptness and Judicial Review» [2009] 14 J.R. 113 «A Framework for Fettering» [2009] 14 J.R. 73 «The
Continued Rise (and Future Fall?)
MCL 722.27 (1) authorizes the
continuing jurisdiction of a circuit
court to modify or amend its previous judgments or orders and is an exception to MCR 7.208 (A) «otherwise provided by law» because it would be contrary to the plain language
of the CCA to require a
court to wait for the conclusion
of an appeal to address a change in circumstances that would affect the interests
of the child.
The
Court determined that under Colorado's Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, a district court retains continuing jurisdiction over motions to modify parental responsibilities while the current allocation order is on appeal, as long as those motions are based on a material change in circumstances that occurred after the original order was ent
Court determined that under Colorado's Uniform Dissolution
of Marriage Act, a district
court retains continuing jurisdiction over motions to modify parental responsibilities while the current allocation order is on appeal, as long as those motions are based on a material change in circumstances that occurred after the original order was ent
court retains
continuing jurisdiction over motions to modify parental responsibilities while the current allocation order is on appeal, as long as those motions are based on a material change in circumstances that occurred after the original order was entered.
The questions as to whether a state could enforce, or would be subject to penalties if it chose to
continue to enforce, its own laws following a denial by the Secretary
of an exception request under § 160.203 or a holding by a
court of competent
jurisdiction that a state privacy law had been preempted by a contrary federal privacy standard raise several issues.
Due to the regulatory scheme and the Visitors
of the Inns
of Court's
jurisdiction, as applicable to the disciplinary proceedings against the Appellant, the Supreme
Court concluded that the Respondent's part in the proceedings before the Disciplinary Tribunal and those before the Visitors should be regarded as part
of a single
continuing act.
As the
courts in Canada
continue to struggle with difficult issues relating to the enforcement
of arbitration agreements and the enforcement
of arbitral awards, it is worth looking at how
courts in other common law
jurisdictions see the relationship between the
courts and arbitration.
Overall, however, the body
of English Law and the approach
of London's commercial
courts should
continue to ensure London remains an attractive
jurisdiction to operate in.
Unfortunately, the Hong Kong
courts and those
of other common law
jurisdictions, which have been provided with no legislative guidelines in this respect,
continue to grapple with this unresolved legal issue.
To learn beyond a doubt whether your Nutter Fort West Virginia certificate
of completion will be sent to the
court or you after completion
of the Nutter Fort West Virginia online traffic school course, simply
continue with the registration process and you will get more detailed information about the particular
court that has
jurisdiction over your ticket.
To find out whether your Utah certificate
of completion will be sent to you or the
court, please
continue with the registration process and you will get more detailed information about the particular
court that has
jurisdiction over your ticket.