However, women in this study who were exercising but also using oral
contraceptives did not show the same benefit: their bones remained the same in spite of the exercise regimen.
You do realize that plenty of unplanned pregnancies result from responsible sex, since the contraceptives didn't work the way they were supposed to, don't you?
Contraceptives do NEITHER.
Allowing free access to contraceptives doesn't endanger our population, it allows families to have a number of children that they know they can support, families with more can support more, and there is nothing stopping them.
Maybe what you're not comprehending is that
contraceptives do more than prevent pregnancy but you'd know that if you took your head out of the buybull and researched the benefits of them.
Their next step, ken, will inevitably be to fire anyone they suspect of buying the contraceptives they don't like.
Are you too dumb to understand that
contraceptives do not only include abortion but more importantly the pill?
I'm pretty sure the amount of money the Church is supposed to pay into the healthcare system for contraceptives doesn't come close to $ 600 million, and that was the amount that had been paid so far to the victims of abuse by 2007.
The mandate means that insurance companies have to pay for preventative services, including birth control, in full, with no co-payments and that the cost of
contraceptives does not count towards the plan's annual deductible, regardless of what level of plan the woman has.
The method has proved its merit, but the current crop of contraceptives doesn't work for everyone.
Most also impact the body in the same way that hormonal
contraceptives do and cause similar problems for the mother as well.
Dave Asprey: Let's talk about what oral
contraceptives do to your hormones.
For years, I've observed that western medicine's primary treatment of common gynecological problems is the birth control pill; still, I was dismayed to read this misinterpretation of what a menstrual cycle is and what oral
contraceptives do to it.
It is also emphasized that safe sex and the use of
contraceptives do not rely on men alone, Women must also take charge of their sexual lives and practice birth control themselves.
The high upfront cost means it requires more planning than other forms of birth control, and since it's a surgical procedure there are risks (however small) that, say, oral contraceptives don't carry.
The devices kill sperm before they can fertilize an egg, and
the contraceptives do so with high rates of success.
Title X National Family Program Overseer Teresa Manning, who believes that contraceptives don't work.
However, the sexual side effects of oral contraceptives don't stop there.
Not exact matches
Globally, more than 200 million women say they don't want to have a child within the next two years but aren't using
contraceptives.
The HHS contraception mandate requires church - related institutions to collaborate with the dominant,
contraceptive culture of our time, and to
do so in a public way.
The statement that will have some social conservatives up in arms is, «I don't believe employers should tell someone whether they could have
contraceptive care or not.»
Many other aspects as well (Catholics don't use
contraceptives cause it's a sin?
The Bible
does not explicitly say not to use
contraceptives.
I am happy that the writer had the choices that she
did... She is also free to decide whether or not she is a Catholic... She however, took an available medication for a health problem... most Catholic facilities recognize such health problems and allow for that treatment... I am completly puzzled, though, that she would not want other Catholics to be able to choose differently than she
did... for those people who wish to use
contraceptive services and medication, options are open to them... I am not Catholic,
did not grow up in a faith based family, and don't know whether a God exists or not... However, to leave a relgious group with no option but to contradict its own tenets is an attempt by those who don't believe in those tenents to mock them, certainly, but more to erode them... this seems the aim of many and when those folks operate from inside the government... that intrusion is an overreach of the govenrment...
And don't forget a pregnancy IS NOT A DISEASE, so what disease are
contraceptives «preventing» if they are such a «boon» to women's health?
The Church
does object to the use of
contraceptives for the purpose of preventing procreation.
aside from stepping on religious rights, ask yourself: why
did Obama / Siebelius choose
contraceptives to be given away for free?
As a Catholic I
do not stand by President Obama and push to have
contraceptives and morning after pills distributed through private and religious based health care providers like their simple sweet jelly beans, especially when they must be paid for with tax dollars.
@ El Flaco... the Protestant secretary needs to realize that her employer is a Catholic organization which
does not believe in
contraceptives, and they (as well as ANY employer) should not be forced into paying for services, as this is what it is, a service, not a medical necessity... yes, even for those women that use it to regulate periods, get rid of cramps heavy bleeding, etc..
In additon to paying for my own
contraceptives, YES I
did pay for my delivery (I have one who is a grown.)
I believe, just like the catholic church, that any form of
contraceptive is indeed immoral since it
does not promote life.
(They already think anyone who is NOT Catholic is going to Hell, so I really don't see why they should care if they use
contraceptives or not... ah well, maybe it's just me...)
@ Flinder — Been there
done that... paid for all of my
contraceptives MYSELF.
Either way, I don't want to get stuck paying for anyone else's choice in
contraceptive methods.
Never once
did the opinion of the church on a person's use of
contraceptives surface.
Even though the official Catholic Church teaches against
contraceptives, I
do not feel immoral using them.
I mean if your issue is paying for things you
do not use then your issue is much bigger than just
contraceptives and I hope you are speaking out against the rest of it as well.
All insurance companies and those involved in healthcare know, that the «total cost of care» is LESS for the plans which OFFER
contraceptive services, than for those who
do not.
The plans who
do not offer
contraceptive services have HIGHER costs as a result of NOT offering the services.
But the abstinence METHOD of eschewing
contraceptives and relying on an «abstinence vow» is a method that can fail and
does fail.
Obama's accommodation proposes that Church authorities who run hospitals, schools, and other facilities will be entitled to tell their employees that the health care insurance provided by the Church
does not cover
contraceptives, the «morning after pill,» or sterilization, but that the health insurance company that covers the Catholic institution will be free to contact the employees of that institution and inform them that they are entitled to «free» coverage of these things from the insurance company in question.
Too bad for you, the Catholic church doesn't allow
contraceptives.
, if you don't want to use
contraceptives, don't.
If your faith prevents you from using
contraceptives, then don't, but not providing it equates to forcing your religion on someone else by preventing them their right to choose.
It doesn't say JUST the morning - after pill... it says «some»
contraceptives.
According the Catholic League, this decision means religious organizations would basically be paying for
contraceptives even if they
do not use them.
The policy goes into effect on August 1, but U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced in a statement January 20 that religious organizations that
do not provide
contraceptive coverage based on religious belief will have until August 1, 2013, to comply.
Do you support a woman's right to use
contraceptives?
There are more than 220 million women in developing countries who don't want to get pregnant, but who lack access to family planning information and
contraceptives.
Although the report
does not «condone» teen sexual activity,
contraceptives will «reduce the risk of unintended pregnancy» and condomization will
do the same for sexually transmitted diseases.