If two parties can always dissolve
a contract by mutual agreement, what is the purpose of outlining this explicitly in the contract like this?
@TonySnow If there are only two parties to a contract, then those two parties can already make whatever changes they want to
the contract by mutual agreement.
Not exact matches
Issues of justice arise when there is a
contract or a
mutual agreement between two people
by which one does something for the other and the other agrees to give something equivalent in return; this equivalence is what is termed the quid pro quo.
«If any driver did not complete a season in a McLaren car for which he was
contracted, it would only happen
by mutual agreement.»
Though there is supposed to be a periodic review of the
contract between the RSML and the NRSC every 5 years, there is no mechanism other than
by mutual agreement and consent to actually vary any of the terms.
All
agreements and stipulations should be recorded either in a sales
contract or
by simple written exchange of
mutual expectations.
All
agreements and stipulations should be recorded either in sales
contracts or
by a simple written exchange of
mutual expectations.
The language used in this Consulting
Agreement will be deemed to be the language chosen
by the Consultant and Client to express their
mutual intent, and no rule of law or
contract interpretation that provides that in the case of ambiguity or uncertainty a provision should be construed against the draftsperson will be applied against either the Consultant or Client.
In the above examples, if the parties wanted arbitration of disputes to be permissive and non-mandatory, they could have clarified their
contract by including more explicit language (i.e., «any and all disputes, upon
mutual agreement, may be arbitrated» or «with the consent of the other party, either party may commence arbitration»).
A commitment to
mutual respect and cooperation to achieve a resolution
by way of a separation
agreement or other domestic
contract.
The only way to become our client is through
mutual agreement,
by contract.
As with a
contract, there are clauses about modifying or terminating the
agreement by mutual agreement.
The tribunal had correctly noted that there was nothing to prevent the parties to a
contract from effecting a variation of it
by mutual agreement, and that the terms of a written instrument might be varied
by a subsequent
agreement, whether written or oral.