As Esmilo takes legal action for default, the question of the validity of
the contract comes before the court.
Not exact matches
This, according to them was because «the issue that
came before the Supreme
Court was simply constitutional interpretation so for (with all respect) the learned judge (Justice Jones Dotse) to go beyond the constitutional interpretation and then decide that the applicant had no
contract with the government and therefore the applicant had no case and that the applicant had formed an alliance to create, loot and share was beyond what was
before the business of the Supreme
Court.»
First, with regard to the judicial avenues foreign investors have against host - states, three
come to mind: (a) bringing a claim
before an investor - state tribunal; (b) bringing a claim
before a domestic
court, based on domestic and / or international standards of protection; and (c) private commercial arbitration based on a
contract between the investor and the host ‑ State.
Skansen, a tiny
contracting company with 30 people working in an open plan office no bigger than a
court room, was dragged to the quarter deck of Southwark Crown Court and duly put on trial before a jury on a charge of failure to prevent bribery under section 7 of the Bribery Act, the first contested trial of this offence since the Act came into force in the summer of
court room, was dragged to the quarter deck of Southwark Crown
Court and duly put on trial before a jury on a charge of failure to prevent bribery under section 7 of the Bribery Act, the first contested trial of this offence since the Act came into force in the summer of
Court and duly put on trial
before a jury on a charge of failure to prevent bribery under section 7 of the Bribery Act, the first contested trial of this offence since the Act
came into force in the summer of 2011.