Not exact matches
If you hire someone under a freelance
contract, but end up providing necessary materials, asking her to work
out of your office or giving constant direction over the work, the government might consider the worker to be an
employee.
To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future
employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs
of settlement and costs
of pursuing indemnification and insurance),
of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort,
contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise
out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse
of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation
of these Terms, (e) your violation
of the rights
of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse
of the Sites or Products provided to you.
In no event shall Non-GMO Project, its officers, directors,
employees, partners, contractors, affiliates, subsidiaries, agents, attorneys, web developers, technical support / maintenance providers, distributors, advertisers, licensors, sublicensees, and / or assigns be liable for any damages, whether arising in
contract, tort or otherwise and including, without limit, any special, incidental, direct, indirect, or consequential damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss
of business profits, business interruption, loss or corruption
of business information or other data, cost
of cover, or any other pecuniary loss) arising
out of the use
of or inability to use the Website, including without limitation, Your participation in any interactive aspect
of the Website and Your use
of any information provided on or in connection with or obtained from the Website, even if Non-GMO Project has been advised
of the possibility
of such damages.
There were also concerns that the
contracting out of work would spread, which currently only affects a small number
of employees.
The gross mismanagement
of Arsenal during June - Aug
of this year is currently my feature case as a prototype
of the worst possible bungling
of personnel resources and mis - assignment
of employee resources to roles (as just a few
of many possible examples, sitting Kola & Laca last match, starting Welbeck who couldn't hit the broad side
of a barn, playing Bellerin at LWB, third straight laughable team assignments in a row, seriously considering loaning
out our 2nd best center back, letting multiple key players enter the final year
of contract, etc etc etc) imaginable.
The court might let government
employees completely opt
out of paying union fees, even if the union works on their behalf in areas like
contract negotiations.
Contract agreements for City University
of New York
employees has been reached, avoiding a threatened faculty and staff walk
out in the fall.
That's the message the Public
Employees Federation is putting
out regarding a minor snag they've spotted with the mailed ballots that members have received as part
of a second try at a labor
contract.
The union's
contract expired at the end
of 2013, and as the local mayoral election heated up in Albany, blue - collar workers came
out in force protesting Sheehan's pay increases for nonunion
employees and demanded wage hikes.
ALBANY, NY (05/03/2012)(readMedia)-- The New York State Public
Employees Federation (PEF) today released its annual report on the high cost of contracting out work that could be done by state employees for
Employees Federation (PEF) today released its annual report on the high cost
of contracting out work that could be done by state
employees for
employees for far less.
And it is still unclear whether the savings plan's board would select investment managers who choose the offerings for
employees savings plans, or
contract out to a third party firm which would be in charge
of selecting investment managers.
While their tentative
contract with the state includes assurances against paying a higher share
of health insurance costs, Public
Employees Federation members will have to wait a bit longer to find
out how much the coming year's health insurance premiums will be.
These includes a proposal for legislation preventing the use
of public money in settling sexual harassment claims, removal
of forced arbitration provisions from
employee contracts and a requirement that companies doing business with the state disclose the number
of sexual harassment adjudications and nondisclosure agreements they've carried
out.
In no event shall DC Bilingual Public Charter School, nor any
of its officers, directors and
employees, shall be held liable for anything arising
out of or in any way connected with your use
of this Website whether such liability is under
contract.
If you are a teacher, or other
employee of a public service organization, under
contract for at least eight
out of twelve months, you meet the full - time standard if you work an average
of at least 30 hours per week during the contractual period and receive credit by your employer for a full year's worth
of employment.
After a full
contract year, an
employee can request to transfer amounts
out of the Personal Income Benefit, causing an early withdrawal which will significantly reduce or eliminate the value
of the Personal Income Benefit.
Determine if the company and its own
employees are those who will actually provide service through the life
of the program, or if they
contract out to others once they have enrolled a client.
There are an array
of different reasons why someone may need to seek
out a retirement savings plan on their own: they may work as a part - time
employee or on a
contract basis, at a small business that does not offer any retirement benefits, or they own their own business and are self - employed.
In no event shall German Shepherd Rescue
of Orange County, nor any
of its officers, directors and
employees, shall be held liable for anything arising
out of or in any way connected with your use
of this Website whether such liability is under
contract.
The simple answer to that is that he is their
employee, as he explained in 1993 in the Independent on Sunday, when he hoped to be appointed for a second seven year term as Tate Director:» Tate trustees fall in and
out of love with their director and I'll only discover whether they have fallen
out of love with me in 1995 when they discuss my
contract... The jury's
out».
No employer or agent
of an employer and no
employee or agent
of an
employee shall
contract out of or waive an employment standard and any such
contracting out or waiver is void.
The Employment Rights Act 1996 sets
out the minimum amount
of notice that must be given while an
employee's
contract could also stipulate that a greater amount
of notice must be provided.
They train their
employees to figure
out ways that they can deny coverage to people, and this often stretches the terms
of the
contract.
If the employment
contract states that an
employee is entitled to be paid for the «8 bank holidays» per year then employers will not need to pay
employees if these choose to take off the 30th March 2018 as this is in excess
of the holiday entitlement set
out in their
contract.
MacIsaac & Company, its lawyers, assistants, contractors and
employees shall have no liability or responsibility for any damages or losses
of any kind whatsoever, whether arising
out of contract, tort or otherwise, relating to or arising from the use or interpretation
of any material or information provided on this website, or any material or information found in any links to this website.
An employer that wants to prohibit
employees recording conversations in the workplace should expressly exercise their option to
contract out of the one - party consent for recordings exception, especially if they want to be able to discipline or dismiss an
employee for surreptitiously recording conversations with supervisors.
Where there is a valid employment
contract, which provides for notice equal to or in excess
of the ESA minimums, then an
employee's entitlements are those set
out in the employment
contract.
The House saw «no reason in law or logic why, leaving aside... the extreme cases
of outright dismissal or walk -
out, a
contract of employment should be on any different footing from any other
contract as regards the principle that «an unaccepted repudiation is a thing writ in water...»» The argument that the
employee impliedly accepted the repudiation by working on under protest was rejected.
According to a recent Superior Court decision, it is a business agreement.2 This case did not involve a LAWPRO claim, but it is a warning to practitioners that disability insurers are free to
contract out of the LA 2002 where a company or an association is a policyholder, even though the policy is for the benefit
of the company's or association's
employees or members.
The Court indicated that specific language
contracting out of common law notice requirements is not necessary where the «intention to displace an
employee's common law notice rights can be readily gleaned from the language agreed to by the parties.»
Over the course
of his nine - year tenure with the company, the
employee entered into three separate «memorandums
of understanding» (essentially
contracts setting
out the terms
of his employment).
A non-compete agreement is a form
of a restrictive covenant, which is a clause in an employment
contract setting
out the rights and obligations
of an
employee post departure.
Whether you need to staff up for a busy time, or you need to replace someone who's going on leave, a Temporary Employment
Contract sets
out the conditions
of the temporary position, and defines the duties
of the newly hired
employee, how and when they'll be paid.
Claimant employers need to carry
out a cost - benefit analysis when deciding whether to pursue former
employees for soliciting their clients, because even if they can show breaches
of contract, they must demonstrate that they suffered loss as a result
of those breaches.
However, writing for the Court
of Appeal, Justice Feldman noted that «the problem with that approach is that, to the extent that it effectively rewrites or reads down the offending provisions... employers will be incentivized to
contract out of the ESA, but include a severability clause to save the offending provision in the event that an
employee has the time and money to challenge the
contract in court.»
What both
employees and employers need to recognize is that simply because there is a
contract, that does not always mean that the amount
of severance set
out in the
contract is the amount
of severance to which to the
employee is entitled.
The employment
contract contained an «early
out» clause, which stated that «employment may be terminated at any time by the Employer and any amounts paid to the
Employee shall be in accordance with the Employment Standards Act
of Ontario.»
it would be an absurd result and contrary to public policy to enforce an arbitration agreement in an employment
contract and thereby deny vulnerable non-unionized
employees their rights and protections under the Employment Standards Act, 2000, which precludes
employees contracting out of their rights under the Act.
Accordingly, as at the date
of the transfer, the
employee was not employed in the organised grouping which carried
out the Borough's
contract, for the purpose
of Reg 4 (1), and so she did not transfer.
... no employer or agent
of an employer and no
employee or agent
of an
employee shall
contract out of or waive an employment standard and any such
contracting out or waiver is void, [unless the
contract provides for a benefit greater than the minimum standards prescribed by the act].
If the employment
contract contains a clause that sets
out the amount
of notice an
employee gets upon being fired and the
contract is valid, then the
employee is entitled only to the reasonable notice set
out therein.
It does not make sense to me how an
employee can be expected to have
contracted out of their inherent common law rights (and perhaps even agreed to something far less) without language that somehow suggests that is precisely what is taking place!
Pre-Oudin there was an accepted «rule book» about required language for
employees to
contract out of their entitlement to common law notice
of termination
of employment — and to restrict themselves to statutory minimums under the Employment Standards Act, 2000 — without offending the ESA.
For example, employer - clients should consider amending
contracts to include an indemnity clause in case the employer - client is sued for unpaid wages arising
out of the temp agency failing to pay the assignment
employee's wages.
It is extremely likely that, in the absence
of an express term setting
out the legal rights and obligations
of employer and
employee (a factor considered in Four Seasons Healthcare Ltd v Maughan [2005] IRLR 324, [2005] All ER (D) 24 (Jan) in relation to suspension without pay prior to conviction) an
employee's unavailability for work would lead to automatic termination
of the
contract under the doctrine
of frustration.
In Bowes, Chief Justice Winkler, writing for a five - member panel
of the Court
of Appeal, held that if an employment agreement specifies the amount payable to an
employee if the employer terminates the employment
contract, whether fixed or readily calculable, the parties have
contracted out of the common law presumption
of providing reasonable notice
of dismissal.
The three options that are available to
employees if their employer unilaterally changes a fundamental terms
of their employment
contracts was set
out by the Ontario Court
of Appeal in Wronko v. Western Inventory Service Ltd, 1 Chief Justice Winkler summarized the options as follows:
In reaching its decision the Court
of Appeal set
out the policy reasons that a court may rely upon to find a constructive dismissal despite explicit language in the employment
contract allowing the employer to unilaterally change the
employee's terms
of employment.
As an employer, you are likely to be familiar with clauses setting
out the «normal retiring age» for
employees and many
of the
contracts of employment
of your own
employees no doubt contain such clauses.
Employers are legally prohibited from
contracting out of the ESA, unless the clause offers a greater benefit to the
employee.