Sentences with phrase «contracting civ»

All dogs can be at risk of contracting CIV — regardless of breed, age, sex or health status.2 In some cases, CIV symptoms can be severe.

However, much like the human flu vaccine, we found that it would greatly reduce the severity of symptoms if the dog did still contract CIV.

Not exact matches

«Dogs that attend daycare, visit the dog park or stay at boarding facilities are all at risk for contracting either strain of CIV,» said Stephan Carey, DVM, PhD, DACVIM, Assistant Professor, Small Animal Clinical Sciences at Michigan State University College of Veterinary Medicine and Past President of The Veterinary Comparative Respiratory Society.

«Dogs that attend day care, visit the dog park or stay at boarding facilities are all at risk for contracting either strain of CIV,» said Michigan State University assistant professor Stephan Carey, DVM, Ph.D., DACVIM.

The budget in Troy Foods v Manton [2013] EWCA Civ 615 was approved following a claim for breach of contract.

The 2008 doorstep selling regulations have just suffered a severe battery from the Court of Appeal in Swift v Robertson [2012] EWCA Civ 1794, [2013] All ER (D) 62 (Jan) in which the trader had failed to give the consumer notice of his right to cancel with prescribed information — a step that must generally be taken when the contract is made.

The beginning and an ending of respective solicitors» retainer contracts are represented by Re Z [2009] EWHC 3621 (Fam) and Buxton v Mills - Owens [2010] EWCA Civ 122, [2010] All ER (D) 242 (Feb).

In Sumukan v Commonwealth Secretariat [2007] EWCA Civ 243, [2007] All ER (D) 341 (Mar) the Court of Appeal held that it was sufficient for the contract to expressly include an arbitration clause which in turn referred to the statute and rules of the relevant arbitral tribunal — in this case the Commonweath Secretariat Arbitral Tribunal (CSAT), which was a body created and constituted by the defendant.

In the case of Inframatrix Investments Ltd v Dean Construction Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 64 the court held that a limitation period of 12 months on the bringing of any action or proceeding under the contract entered into between the claimant and respondent was valid.

On appeal from [2015] EWCA Civ 407 The case considered whether a contract for the design and installation of foundations...

Amy was junior counsel in Ranson v Customer Systems plc [2012] EWCA Civ 841 (an employment dispute before the Court of Appeal regarding a claim for breach of contract, fiduciary duty and restrictive covenant).

The gaps can be bridged by use of s 212 of ERA 1996 as a temporary cessation of work during an employment contract which enabled Mrs Prater to successfully claim sufficient continuity to bring a claim for unfair dismissal (Prater v Cornwall County Council [2006] EWCA Civ 102, [2006] 2 All ER 1013).

In Newham LBC v Thomas Van - Staden [2008] EWCA Civ 1414 the Court of Appeal recently held that «contracting out» was ineffective where a lease defined the term as a fixed period together with «any period of holding over or extension; whether by statute or at common law or by agreement».

Close v Wilson [2011] EWCA Civ 5 (gambling, wagering, restitution, void contract, agency)- Rory Brown acted pro bono for the successful appellant.

Successfully represented STANDARD CHARTERED BANK in proceedings before the High Court and Court of Appeal in relation to a substantial demand guarantee dispute, which formed part of a US$ 130m contract for the supply of electricity in Bangladesh (Greenland Bank - v - AMEX [2008] EWCH 421 (CH) and [2009] EWCA Civ 14)

Eric Parham v F. Parham Ltd: [2006] EWCA Civ 181 Appeared for successful respondent in the Court of Appeal in a matter concerning the interpretation of an employment contract.

In JBW Ltd v Ministry of Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 8 (16 January 2011) the Court of Appeal held that the procurement of bailiff services by the Ministry of Justice was a service concession and therefore fell outside the scope of the Public Contracts Regulations 2006 («the Regulations»).

Wilson & Sharp Investments v Harbourview Developments [2015] EWCA Civ 1030 (Injunction to restrain a winding up petition on a # 1.2 million interim certificate under a JCT Contract.

In Clin v Walter Lilly & Co Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 490, the English Court of Appeal held that, in the absence of express provisions, a term should be implied into an amended JCT contract to require the Employer to use «all due diligence» to obtain statutory approvals.

In such cases, courts and arbitral tribunals are likely to scrutinise the contracts carefully in order to determine the scope of the arbitration agreement (in Trust Risk Group SpA v AmTrust Europe Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 437, the argument was unsuccessful; in C v D1, D2 and D3 [2015] EWHC 2126 (Comm), the argument was successful).

In some cases, the contract expressly provides that the bank exercise certain powers only in a «commercially reasonable manner», eg RBS v Highland Financial Partners [2010] EWHC Civ 3119 (Comm).

Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2009] EWCA Civ 1046, [2009] All ER (D) 134 (Oct) is another useful decision of the Court of Appeal on the hitherto vexed question of how to deal with terms put into contracts by employers to negate employment status, when most or all of the other factors point towards employment.

In P&O Nedlloyd BV v Arab Metals Co [2006] EWCA Civ 1717, [2006] All ER (D) 187 (Dec) the Court of Appeal had to consider the application of s 36 to a claim for specific performance of a contract.

Cavendish Corporate Finance LLP v. GIL Investments Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 368 (CA)-- Proper construction of contract for corporate finance fee upon multi-million pound company sale.

Notably in making this holding, she referred to Crossely [2007] EWCA Civ 1491 where the pre-nuptial contract was regarded as a «magnetic», factor such that it could be given effect to on the basis of a Notice to Show Cause application.

Both decisions provide a restrictive interpretation of the test set out in the Court of Appeal's decision in Dacas v Brook Street Borough (UK) Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 217, [2004] All ER (D) 125 (Mar) on the issue of implying a contract of employment between a worker and end user in a tripartite employment agency arrangement.

Her ladyship referred to the case of Axa General Insurance Ltd v Gottlieb and Gottlieb [2005] EWCA Civ 112, [2005] 1 All ER (Comm) 445 and acknowledged that there was a well established common law rule that if a genuine claim made under an insurance contract is dishonestly exaggerated, the whole claim will be dismissed; further, if money has already been paid pursuant to a claim under such a contract before the fraud is discovered, all the sums paid under that claim will be recoverable by the insurer, including any sum referable to the genuine part of the claim.