The claim that this belief also forces us to include the virgin birth and all sorts of other NT teachings in «the gospel» is simply wrong, ill - conceived, and
contradicted by Scripture.
My own parents seem indocrinated into ideas that are (to my mind)
contradicted by scripture.
Not exact matches
The convictionâ $» endemic among churchfolkâ $» persists that, if problems of misapprehension and misrepresentation are overcome and the gospel can be heard in its own integrity, the gospel will be found attractive
by people, become popular, and, even, be a success of some sortâ $ ¦ This idea is both curious and ironical because it is bluntly
contradicted in
Scripture and in the experience of the continuing biblical witness in history from the event of Pentecost unto the present momentâ $ (William Stringfellow, quoted in A Keeper of the Word, p. 348).
It is
contradicted by nearly every narrative of
scripture, as God urges, warns and sends prophets to call people to turn from sin, rewards those who obey and punishes those who refuse.
Many of our churches are excessively influenced, and some even dominated,
by radical ideologies whose agendas
contradict the
Scriptures and historic teachings that are the foundation of Christian faith.
To be sure, we have an expanded canon of
Scripture, but nothing within the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, or Pearl of Great Price
contradicts what is taught in the Bible regarding the virgin birth (which,
by the way, we definitely believe in), teachings, miracles, atoning sacrifice, or bodily resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth.
In The Bible Tells Me So, Peter Enns attempts to present an approach to
Scripture which allows for us to accept that it has historical and scientific errors and that it
contradicts itself at various places, and yet still retain the Bible as an important witness to the theological and spiritual struggles which were faced
by our forefathers in the faith, and more importantly, as a historical document about the life of Jesus and how the death and resurrection of Jesus resulted in the transformation of the first century mediterranean world.
Fundamentalism has been characterized
by (1) vigorous resistance to developments in the world of science that appeared to
contradict the Biblical text; (2) Biblical literalism; (3) individualism; (4) moralism; and (5) insistence on belief in certain «fundamentals» such as the inerrancy of the
Scriptures, the virgin birth of Jesus Christ, and his second coming.
There, at Worms, in the presence of the newly elected Emperor, Charles V, the mightiest monarch in Europe, and of the dignitaries of Church and State, Luther, the son of peasant parents, declared that he could not accept the authority of Popes and councils, since they had often
contradicted one another, and that unless he was convinced
by Scripture and plain reason he could not in good conscience recant anything he had written.
Unless I am convinced
by the testimony of the
Scriptures or
by clear reason (for I do not trust either in the Pope or in councils alone, since it is well known that they have often erred and
contradicted themselves), I am bound
by the
Scriptures I have quoted and my conscience is captive to the Word of God.