Sentences with phrase «contrarian opinion»

Having said that, we must also keep in mind that there are cases where the contrarian opinion is the correct one.

Contrarian opinion articles have run in p...

Although it is an AP story, they still ran it, without contrarian opinion.

These papers «educate» the UK Conservative party and have form in misrepresenting or reversing the latest climate research * in their news section as well as employing extremist contrarian opinion pieces.

Here's a great example of me wondering if I'm having a contrarian opinion just to have one, but here it is anyway: I thought Tomb Raider was a much better game than Last of Us.

His most famously contrarian opinion may be the defense of Zack Snyder's 2011 film Sucker Punch.

At the iCONIC Tour in Chicago, the first event of a three - city series hosted by CNBC and Inc., Cuban spoke openly about his somewhat contrarian opinion regarding mentorship.

Peter, thank you for stopping by The Future of Ink and for bringing your delightfully contrarian opinions as well... I'll be really interested in Lynne's take on what you have to say!

In my view the first and foremost guideline should still be something like: «be though, do what you can to pull your audience upwards in the reason ladder, and do not bend knees to cheap and quick communication tricks that could as quickly be reversed by the next person who even better master communication skills but wants to push forward contrarian opinions».

It is not the dismissal of contrarian opinions that I object to.

What about the contrarian opinions you've heard?

Not exact matches

Uranium still remains a contrarian pick and low cost producers offer the most attractive risk / reward profile, in my opinion.

In fact, our contrarian strategy isn't limited solely to betting against the public; it also includes fading the opinions of hype machines like the mothership.

The contrarian plays often go against generally - accepted opinions — leading to value — and profits in the long - term.

This indicator of public opinion, based on actual bets, backs SportsInsights» concepts of contrarian value and can not be found anywhere else.

These artificially inflated lines have historically created value for opportunistic contrarian bettors since they're getting a better line purely based on the opinion of recreational bettors.

I understand that this doesn't fit as a contrarian underdog, but should we still we be wary of the favorite because of the lopsided opinion or does the postseason change that factor??

And strong public opinion leads to contrarian value for «betting against the Public.»

One must therefore conclude that those contrarians who have warmly welcomed Ruddiman's thesis have now come around to mainstream opinion.

A contrarian move is to buy into a stock or fund whose price is rising despite continuous and widespread market opinion that the price should be falling.

Succeeding as a contrarian is all about knowing when to act on your opinion about the next turn in the market.

I never got the impression you TRIED to be contrarian, but when the opinion is honest it's good to see things from another perspective.

So, if your cointegration approach does prove successful (which is something that I consider unlikely), what magic ingredient do you employ to make it irrefutable in the face of reluctant public & political opinion and in the face of aggressive contrarian opposition?

The simple fact of the matter is that the MSM censors any contrarian scientific opinion that refutes what the «mainstream» scientists say about AGW.

Do you really think that you can extrapolate from questions on opinions about whether climate change is predominantly anthropogenic in nature to demographic characteristics of people who «speak out» as «climate contrarians» camp, or who are «leftists?»

So are contrarian climate scientists around the world so utterly terrified of their colleagues and world opinion that they would not dare to hazard a contrarian explanation at all, especially if it were based on sound science?

The critique emerged in a rather confused form, with a number of letters and opinion pieces before finally being published in contrarian social science journal Energy and Environment.

As we suggested to William Happer, if climate contrarians want their opinions to be taken seriously, they should engage in real science within the peer - review system that works for every scientific field.

For the case of climate change, Thagard and Findlay (2011) showed that the contrarian position, exemplified by the opinion that global warming is a natural fluctuation, is incoherent in comparison to the mainstream scientific position.

But painting this as the «normal», opinion - based sort of consensus is a good denial tactic, as is highlighting the views of the very few contrarian climate scientists (who are in the same boat as the people who authored negative trials on aspirin, if there are any - they're destined for the dustbin of science history.)

Instead he chose to run to a Daily Mail trash tabloid «journalist» with a known history of false claims, and a contrarian blog, to present his unrefereed opinions.

For laypeople, the consensus is the best bet, not the opinion of bloggers or contrarian scientists.

> Oh, so you have some data showing you figured out exactly what the «consensus» [contrarian] opinion happens to be,

IMO, the selfish nature of climate contrarians makes them little better than thieves, an opinion reinforced when I recall many condone hacking.

Oh, and if you are gambling, you will eventually lose your money, along with the rest of us who didn't choose to gamble that all the simple physics and obvious phenomena could be overcome by a PR machine and a small group of honest contrarians among a vast mass of purchasable opinions.

In this post we will examine the claims made by Giaever in his talk, and show that his contrarian climate opinions come from a position of extreme ignorance on the subject, as Giaever admits.

In common with the right - wing contrarians, Cockburn's opinions are not formed from a dispassionate look at the evidence, but come from a post hoc reasoning given his dislike of the purported implications.

First we didn't assume «doing your best» was related to effort or desire to do good, it related to having the understanding that boards of directors and committees should be seeking independent, unbiased, expert advice and contrarian dissenting opinion on that advice to ensure, all options are considered before entering any area impacted by new technologies.