Following three state appellate court rulings in the second appellate division in September 2017 requiring healthcare agencies to pay home care workers for all their hours on 24 - hour shifts, Governor Cuomo's Department of Labor issued «emergency regulations» in October consistent with
contrary federal court rulings allowing payment for only 13 hours.
Not exact matches
«We strongly belief that President Buhari, must be seen to be acting
contrary to
court decisions on the use of Military during elections as clearly stated in the rulings of Justice Aikawa of the Federal High Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Asse
court decisions on the use of Military during elections as clearly stated in the
rulings of Justice Aikawa of the
Federal High
Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Asse
Court, who in his judgment, restrained the President and Commander - in - Chief of the Armed Forces of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Assembly.
Yesterday, the Law Memo blog posted a link to a 9th Circuit decision, Pollard v. GEO Group, holding —
contrary to what other
courts of appeals have
ruled — that
federal prison inmates may recover damages under the Bivens doctrine from employees of private corporations running those prisons pursuant to contracts with the Bureau of Prisons.
However, the last quarter century has seen a dramatic
contrary shift in the way the
federal courts, especially the U.S. Supreme Court, have interpreted and applied the Federal Rules and other procedural m
federal courts, especially the U.S. Supreme
Court, have interpreted and applied the
Federal Rules and other procedural m
Federal Rules and other procedural matters.