On most if not all of these issues, Dionne stands exactly where Podesta stands — preferring his politics to
the contrary teaching of the faith he claims to love and profess.
Not exact matches
Now, here's where I suspect Challies and I may agree: Because we believe Scripture to be authoritative in matters
of faith and practice and a trustworthy testimony regarding Jesus Christ, we would be right to be highly suspicious
of anyone whose claims about their experiences with God run
contrary to the
teachings of Scripture.
Even if they are skeptical
of Christian
faith, it isn't very hard to see that Mormon
teachings are
contrary to the spirit and verse
of the Bible.
I agree that Obama is not a Muslim, and I think he believes many elements
of the Christian
faith, but he also has indicated that he believes in «many paths to the same place» and other universalist
teachings that are
contrary to the Bible.
Contrary to the Augustinian
teaching on original sin, and human nature, they emphasized human freedom and the responsibilities and obligations
of Christian
faith.
«Favoring people [like Christians] on the basis
of their
faith rather than their needs is definitely discriminatory and
contrary to the Bible's
teaching,» he said.
CAT, I mean YOU, among other posters here who show a genuine distaste for * gasp * actually reading and learning and exploring the
teachings of your
faith... Which, btw, is
contrary to the spirit
of faith, which is a search
of divine TRUTH.