Sentences with phrase «control over evaluations»

As NYC Educator pointed out in his latest piece, Unity's shiny new talking point is that they want principals not to have total control over evaluations.

Not exact matches

In particular, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management and, to the extent that we are no longer an «emerging growth company» as defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act.

Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods or adversely affect the results of management evaluations and independent registered public accounting firm audits of our internal control over financial reporting that we will eventually be required to include in our periodic reports that will be filed with the SEC.

Addressing the media during the registration exercise at Sege in the Ada West District on Thursday, Mr Thomas Boateng Quaison, Head, Monitoring and Evaluation, LEAP Project, said beneficiaries would be migrated onto the e-zwich platform where they would have greater control over the management of their funds as they would decide when to access their funds.

The opt - out effort this year has united different political strains: Republicans and conservatives are skeptical of Common Core as it pertains to a loss of local control for school districts, while the state's teachers union is encouraging the movement as well over concerns of how the results will impact performance evaluations.

The board and state Education Department generally have control over education decisions in the state, but recent legislation regarding the teacher evaluation system has caused a flurry of controversy.

It is uncertain whether other school districts can replicate these effects, because they depend on factors that many have little control over (including the local supply of high - performing teachers), as well as those they do control (for instance, the introduction of meaningful teacher evaluation).

In every experimental evaluation of private school voucher programs, the students who won the voucher lottery but did not consistently use their voucher to attend private schools have remained in the study over time as members of the treatment group, and the students who lost the voucher lottery but enrolled in private school have remained in the study as members of the control group.

After extensive research on teacher evaluation procedures, the Measures of Effective Teaching Project mentions three different measures to provide teachers with feedback for growth: (1) classroom observations by peer - colleagues using validated scales such as the Framework for Teaching or the Classroom Assessment Scoring System, further described in Gathering Feedback for Teaching (PDF) and Learning About Teaching (PDF), (2) student evaluations using the Tripod survey developed by Ron Ferguson from Harvard, which measures students» perceptions of teachers» ability to care, control, clarify, challenge, captivate, confer, and consolidate, and (3) growth in student learning based on standardized test scores over multiple years.

For instance, a federal or state education chief is a non-local actor with control over a public school's teacher evaluation progress or college - and - career ready curriculum.

In a months - long tussle between IES and Congress over the evaluation of Upward Bound, IES insisted that a robust test of whether the program made a difference to students required a control group — students eligible for but not served by it.

The American Federation of Teachers commented that while states acquire control over «accountability, resources, interventions and teacher evaluation systems» in 2017, «some states will mess up» with implementing the ESSA.

Removes all flexibility / local control from districts and makes the Florida Department of Education the sole decision - making authority over teacher evaluations, pay schedules and working conditions

In the suit, the National Education Association New Mexico argues state law gives school districts authority over teacher evaluations and the system Education Secretary - designate Hanna Skandera put in place last year takes away that local control.

They claim the higher scores in Massachusetts and New Jersey result from linking teacher evaluation to student test scores, «tiered intervention» (progressively stronger state control) in schools and giving the education commissioner unprecedented power to take over schools, so we better rush to put those reforms back into Connecticut's education bill, SB24.

«Half of our evaluation was coming from some source we had no control over,» he said.

The value - added model is thought to bring objectivity to teacher evaluations, because it compares students to themselves over time and largely controls for influences outside teachers» control, such as poverty and parental involvement.

Is state control over district flexibility in creating and implementing their own evaluation system low, moderate, or high?

For teachers who are experiencing challenges associated with introduction of the Common Core and new teacher evaluation systems (APPR in New York and PARCC testing in Illinois), edTPA is one testing instrument they have some degree of control over — they can choose not to have anything to do with it.

Schools and teachers have a lot of control over the methods of evaluation.

In doing so, it hands more control to states over things like accountability, testing, standards and teacher evaluations.

Over the last several years federal and state accountability legislation has come under attack from a duo of strange bedfellows: Tea Party / Trump - ish acolytes who wave the banner of local control and teacher union leaders who disdain objective measurements of student learning, at least when they're tied to teacher evaluations and job security.

Such ratings would result in physical education and music teacher's evaluations being based on math and ELA scores over which the teacher had no influence or control.

In January, when the first deadline was moved from January 17th to February 22nd, Cuomo threatened a total loss of over $ 500 million to the city, a loss of control over Title I and Title II funds, and an evaluation system imposed by the state.

Sure, the author electronically published his book, but the book never went through any kind of evaluation, most probably wasn't edited (because many self - published authors wish to retain all creative control over their book) and more than likely didn't sell more than a hundred copies.

A temporal evaluation of the investment benefits of commodity futures indicates that, after controlling for changes in the Fed's policy rates, the benefits have remained fairly consistent over time.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commcontrol over financial reporting based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway CommControl — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

The memo goes on: «SEJ's most consistent complaint on evaluations over the years: Moderators allowed panelists to ramble or lost control of the point of the session.

This means management must assume a proactive role for recommending policy and maintaining adequate control over such activities as recruitment, training and career development of associates; staffing of the firm's practice areas; allocation of work to attorneys; assuring adequate administrative support; developing an associate evaluation program; utilization of paralegals and law clerks; establishing criteria for admission to partnership; developing a compensation plan and benefits program; assuring adequate communications between partners and associates, etc..

This means management must assume a proactive role for recommending policy and maintaining adequate control over such activities as recruitment, training and career development of associates; staffing of the firm's practice areas; allocation of work to attorneys; assuring adequate administrative support; developing an associate evaluation program; utilization of paralegals and law clerks; establishing criteria for admission to partnership; developing a compensation plan and benefits program; assuring adequate communications among partners and associates, etc..

RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Performed shop set - up, job set - up, price quotes, developed and implemented employee evaluation program, provided Plant and Field Safety, and served as Quality Control, Field Superintendent over all Union Trades personnel.

SUMMARY: * Professional with over 13 years of Risk and Operational management (LOD01, LOD02 and LOD03) including: Audit, Commercial, Corporate, Consumer Credits, Credit Card Operations and Risk controls (products including: LOC, Conventional, VA, Commercial RE and ACH risk transaction evaluations).

Over 20 years of underwriting and quality control experience with demanding employers and customers allows me to offer expertise in underwriting analysis, appraisal evaluation, compliance, and collateral documentation review to ensure compliance with bank, regulatory and investor requirements while still maintaining excellent customer relationships.

A randomised controlled trial is currently underway with 13 partner schools using pre / post evaluation of mindfulness, wellbeing and schoolwork engagement, and 3 month follow - up to assess whether improvements are sustained over time.

Self - efficacy refers to the subjective evaluation of control over a specific behavior.

It is based on the hypothesis that inaccurate and unhelpful beliefs, ineffective coping behaviour, negative mood states, social problems, and pathophysiological processes all interact to perpetuate the illness.8 9 Treatment aims at helping patients to re-evaluate their understanding of the illness and to adopt more effective coping behaviours.7 8 9 An early uncontrolled evaluation of this type of treatment produced promising results in many patients but was unacceptable to some.10 Two subsequent controlled trials found cognitive behaviour therapy to offer no benefit over non-specific management.11 12 However, the form of cognitive behaviour therapy evaluated may have been inadequate.