The worrying question is what will happen when the government has total
control over funding for every school from 2019/20 onwards?
It wants a pure model where after two years, it will have total
control over the funding for every school in the country.
With the link between schools and local authorities being further reduced, the DfE has suggested that councils will retain
some control over funding for areas with «high - level special educational needs».
They should be ensuring school leavers are equipped with the skills they need for work, including the 50 % who don't choose to go to university; that employers are given more
control over the funding for training and skills; and by ensuring that young people who have been unemployed for longer than a year are guaranteed a job - so that no young person is allowed to fall completely out of touch with the world of work.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential
for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences
for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals
for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand
for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional
funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price
for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export
control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate
for our additional capital needs or
for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions
for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
In the end, this is actually probably one of the most popular options
for those who are really series about
funding a startup because it allows you to keep
control over your company, earn mentorship when it's needed, and hopefully make money as your company continues to grow.
For this business owner, the upside of losing angel
funding was retaining equity and
control over his company.
In our view, there needs to be more Parliamentary
control, not less,
over the amounts of
funds the Government can borrow and
for what purposes.
Over 95 per cent of Canada's infrastructure is controlled by the provinces, territories and municipalities, for which the federal government already allocates significant amounts of funding through its New Building Canada Plan; a $ 53 billion plan spread over ten ye
Over 95 per cent of Canada's infrastructure is
controlled by the provinces, territories and municipalities,
for which the federal government already allocates significant amounts of
funding through its New Building Canada Plan; a $ 53 billion plan spread
over ten ye
over ten years.
While the retention of
control over funds is often cited as one of the main reasons
for pursuing decentralized cryptocurrency exchanges, they offer far more than that.
Paper wallets are often a good choice
for people who want total
control over their
funds because they are stored completely out of the prying eyes of any hacker, but can be a risk if the piece of paper is lost or damaged.
The religious right are in the courts fighting
for control over women's reproductive rights, defending their pastors
for illicit se x ual indiscretion and misappropriation of
funds.
«First, we're pleased that the Assembly included a seven - year extension of mayoral
control, as well as an increase in school aid and
funds for universal pre-K
over the Executive Budget,» de Blasio said.
A «human rights activist» even said, rather worryingly, that, «there is need
for government to maintain
control over these NGOs precisely because of their access to
funds which needed to be accounted
for.»
Cuomo, who in the past has touted his
control over New York City's subway system, doubled down on his argument that New York City, not the state, is responsible
for funding upgrades to its beleaguered subway system.
The left - leaning Institute
for Public Policy Research (IPPR) argued that although the localism agenda was promising, it will be largely meaningless unless the coalition delivers «real powers with new
funding streams that give local people more
control over how their taxes are spent».
Gov. Andrew Cuomo
controls the MTA, but de Blasio is still at the center of the fight
over funding for the system.
Also, the governor and lawmakers are responsible
for crafting the state budget, a process that gives them great
control over which programs to
fund and leaves education officials in an advisory role.
She says the remaining fight is
over how much
control Cuomo's budget department has in handing out the
funds, and whether total cost
for counties» legal defense services would be financed by the state, or only a portion.
Yegeri also explained the DA's desire
for state officials also enact legislation stripping pension, retirement benefits and
control over campaign
funds from elected officials convicted of a crime, expelled from office, or resign due to a crime committed during their service.
Hevesi admitted to using his
control over the state's pension
fund, now at $ 130 billion, to steer $ 250 million in investments to a private equity
fund that paid him handsomely: $ 75,000 in trips to Israel and Italy
for him, his adult children, and people from his staff; $ 500,000 in campaign contributions, and $ 380,000 in make - believe consulting fees to a lobbyist allied with Hank Morris, Hevesi's political guru.
Despite Governor Cuomo declaring a state of emergency
for the ailing system and acknowledging
control over the transit agency, he continues to turn toward the city
for funding to carry out repairs.
The hostilities between the mayor and the governor have only escalated in the last year
over a variety of concerns, including mayoral
control of New York City schools and proposed cuts in
funding to the City University of New York, tumbling into public view with a rare intensity, even
for two jobs that are often in conlfict.
Knowing that religious selection in admissions creates segregation along class and ethnic lines, having a clear policy in favour of inclusion and taking great care not to allow any state -
funded faith schools to have
control over its own admissions would also make sense
for a Labour approach.
The district has been fighting
for some time
over funding, with the Orthodox Jewish -
controlled school board diverting
funds to Yeshivas — religious private schools that educate a minority of students — and away from the public schools attended by a majority of students, many of whom are black and Latino.
Laurence Laufer, de Blasio's longtime election lawyer, lashed out
over the leak of a damning government memo alleging criminality in the mayor's
fund - raising efforts
for a failed, Democratic bid to seize
control of the state Senate in 2014.
The Senate leader says he's also seeking more
control over distribution of
funds for transportation infrastructure projects, and Governor Cuomo's regional economic development councils grants.
The plan has its limitations: state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli runs the
fund and Cuomo has zero
control over the pension
fund for hundreds of thousands of state and local government workers and retirees.
On Wednesday, members of the city council's Progressive Caucus, including Councilman Daniel Dromm, chair of the Education Committee, came to Albany asking state legislators to adopt a budget that provides
funding mandated by the Campaign
for Fiscal Equity court decision, excludes additional resources
for charter schools, leaves the charter school cap at current levels and provides more local
control over the city's schools.
Some in the WFP, a union -
controlled New York City - based party, even fear that with Cuomo at the top of their ticket, they won't get the 50,000 votes needed
for legal recognition because of voter anger
over the governor's refusal to support Mayor de Blasio's plan to tax high earners to
fund universal pre-K.
Miner stepped down as co-chair of the Cuomo -
controlled Democratic State Committee last year, and most recently has been in a public dispute
over whether the state should direct
funds to upgrade infrastructure in Syracuse and other cities or funnel them to projects tailored
for economic development.
But the private law firm representing Antonacci (paid
for by county taxpayers) is fighting with the county attorney's office (taxpayer -
funded and
controlled by Mahoney)
over what information the county should turn
over to all parties in the case.
The Republicans
controlling the House of Representatives and Senate have been at odds
over whether to pass the House's DHS
funding bill, which would
fund the agency but blocks financing
for President Barack Obama's controversial plan to protect undocumented immigrants from deportation through an executive order.
De Blasio and Gov. Cuomo, along with MTA officials, have been gridlocked
over who has responsibility
for properly
funding mass transit — the governor who
controls the region's transportation authority or the mayor whose city depends on subways and buses.
She says the remaining fight is
over how much
control Cuomo's budget department has in handing out the
funds, and whether the total cost
for counties legal defense services would be financed by the state or only a portion.
««This bill will put a plan in place
for the Appropriations Committee to reverse the 10 - year retrenchment in biomedical research
funding over the remaining years of the Budget
Control Act,» Harkin said in July when he introduced the legislation, called the Accelerating Biomedical Research Act.»
She leads the Maryland site of the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, a project
funded by the US Centers
for Disease
Control and Prevention to provide comparable, population - based estimates of the prevalence rates of autism and related disorders from different sites
over time.
Hence by a stroke of a pen, AstraZeneca was able to acquire exclusive commercial
control over a technology that was developed with public
funding and purportedly pursued
for a humanitarian cause.
The largest part of scientific
funding is
for military work and
for technologies that enhance
control over populations.
This past summer, the Institute
for Education Sciences (IES) released a summary of randomized
controlled trials (RCTs)
funded over the past decade.
The key points from each strand are highlighted as follows: Early Identification and support • Early identification of need: health and development review at 2/2.5 years • Support in early years from health professionals: greater capacity from health visiting services • Accessible and high quality early years provision: DfE and DfH joint policy statement on the early years; tickell review of EYFS; free entitlement of 15 hours
for disadvantaged two year olds • A new approach to statutory assessment: education, health and care plan to replace statement • A more efficient statutory assessment process: DoH to improve the provision and timeliness of health advice; to reduce time limit
for current statutory assessment process to 20 weeks Giving parent's
control • Supporting families through the system: a continuation of early support resources • Clearer information
for parents: local authorities to set out a local offer of support; slim down requirements on schools to publish SEN information • Giving parents more
control over support and
funding for their child: individual budget by 2014
for all those with EHC plan • A clear choice of school: parents will have rights to express a preference
for a state -
funded school • Short breaks
for carers and children: a continuation in investment in short breaks • Mediation to resolve disagreements: use of mediation before a parent can register an appeal with the Tribunal
All schools will have considerable autonomy — including
control over staffing, the authority to set their own budgets, and the freedom to offer extended school days or longer school years — but will be held accountable
for results, and
funds will follow students as they choose the schools that best meet their needs.
As the event page notes, ESAs give families almost unfettered
control over the public
funds allocated
for their child's education.
Join Craig Nulan on Wednesday, March 27th to hear how his team was able to implement single - pane access and
control over each supported platform to: • Satisfy criteria and prove compliance in support of federal program grants and
funds • Easily manage and support computers (used
for one - to - one programs) and a growing mobile device fleet, from a single console • Investigate theft incidents, adjust security protocols, and recover stolen devices
Gov. Jerry Brown's new school
funding system is based on the idea that school districts, not Sacramento, should be given
control over spending and then held accountable
for students» results.
Importantly, the government did not mention increased federal
control over education; rather,
funding was the primary justification
for this expansion
Instead of a system with limited choice
for families, predicated on a lottery system, all families in the District should have
control over their child's share of education
funding, and should be able to take those
funds to any school or education option of choice.
Projected increases in
funding under Proposition 98, which sets a minimum funding level for schools, plus more money to the district under the state's Local Control Funding Formula, should ease some of the tensions over the district's special treatment for Priority S
funding under Proposition 98, which sets a minimum
funding level for schools, plus more money to the district under the state's Local Control Funding Formula, should ease some of the tensions over the district's special treatment for Priority S
funding level
for schools, plus more money to the district under the state's Local
Control Funding Formula, should ease some of the tensions over the district's special treatment for Priority S
Funding Formula, should ease some of the tensions
over the district's special treatment
for Priority Schools.
Public education advocates will have many opportunities in the coming months to fight
for greater
funding for our children's schools and against state takeovers that hand our democratically
controlled school boards
over to private third party operators.
And when we talk about improving public education, and the very real and increasing threat that is coming from the corporate «education reform» types, who want to layoff teachers, ban or reduce collective bargaining rights, take -
over public schools and transfer the care and
control of our public schools to various third parties... let's not forget that many districts do not
fund enough IA positions and every district fails to fairly compensate IAs
for the incredible work they do.