Not exact matches
This is forward going action for getting
control of global warming by stopping unneeded GHG emissions increasing the overload of
carbon dioxide
on the globe while also getting
control of water
pollution.
RCP4.5 is based
on the MiniCAM Level 2 stabilization scenario reported in Clarke et al. (2007) with additional detail
on the non-CO2 and
pollution control assumptions documented by Smith and Wigley (2006), and incorporating updated land use modeling and terrestrial
carbon emissions pricing assumptions as reported in Wise et al. (2009a, b).
«More than two dozen of the nation's biggest corporations, including the five major oil companies, are planning their future growth
on the expectation that the government will force them to pay a price for
carbon pollution as a way to
control global warming.»
First is regulation that could strand assets in several ways: direct regulation
on carbon led by authorities at the local, national, regional, or global level; indirect regulation through increased
pollution controls, constraints
on water usage, or policies targeting health concerns; and mandates
on renewable energy adoption and efficiency standards.
But countries across the world are pledging to
control if not cut
carbon pollution as international leaders prepare for a summit
on climate change in Paris later this year.