In July, Representative Lamar Smith (R - TX) asked NOAA for both data and internal communications related to
a controversial climate change study.
Not exact matches
That's the conclusion of a 5 - year
study, which found that when news organizations ran a number of stories on
controversial topics like water quality and
climate change in close succession, they significantly boosted public conversations about these topics — and even
changed some people's minds.
When politicians want to cut funding, he notes, they focus on specific
controversial studies or areas — such as
climate change, stem cells or genetically modified organisms.
In 2012, a
controversial study challenged previously accepted ideas about the mechanisms through which
climate change will affect our weather: Warmer temperatures will result in more heat waves, hotter summers will bring worse droughts, the warmer atmosphere will hold more water, resulting in heavier precipitation and flooding.
Recently, the effects of ongoing
climate change (ocean warming and acidification) on N2 fixation drew much attention, but various
studies led to
controversial conclusions.
The crux of Bates» claim is that NOAA, the federal government's top agency in charge of
climate science, published a poorly - researched but widely praised
study with the political goal of disproving the
controversial global warming hiatus theory, which suggests that global warming slowed down from 1998 until 2012 with little
change in globally - averaged surface temperatures — a direct contrast to global warming advocates» claim that the earth's temperature has been constantly increasing.
Controversial Method Of Addressing
Climate Change Needs More
Study, Experts Say — Huffington Post.
It looks as if the
study - conducted by a team led by Robert Howarth, and to be published in May's Climatic
Change Letters - has put shale - gas, extracted using
controversial hydraulic fracturing technology, at the top of the
climate impact bad - boy league.