Conventional ethanol production is energy - intensive, expensive, and time - consuming as the barley malt or other material being brewed needs to be heated up as a mash in feedstock pre-treatment.
However, the ethanol concentration yielded from a cellulosic ethanol process tends to be significantly lower than the concentration obtained in
a conventional ethanol production.
Not exact matches
Reynolds even believes that if
ethanol production hits 10 billion gallons and consumers embrace E85 — the 85 percent
ethanol mix — a dedicated pipeline from the Midwest to the East Coast could make economic sense, although the
conventional wisdom remains against him.
Incidentally, how would the net btu's / acre achieved by
ethanol production (if any) compare to the btu's / acre that could be achieved by using solar cells to electrolyze water during sun hours, then burning the hydrogen and oxygen in a
conventional steam plant 24/7 at a rate slightly less than the average rate of O2 / H2
production?