Not exact matches
Oil sands extraction raises concerns among environmentalists because it generates more of the heat - trapping gases causing climate change than conventional oil drilling, among other thi
Oil sands
extraction raises concerns among environmentalists because it generates more of the heat - trapping gases causing climate change than
conventional oil drilling, among other thi
oil drilling, among other things
Fluid injection can occur with
conventional oil and gas
extraction methods, which extract fuel from underground pools, and with unconventional methods like fracking, which recover
oil and gas from small voids in rocks.
They looked both at wells used for enhanced
oil recovery — in which fluid is injected to flush lingering
oil from a depleted reservoir — and at those used to dispose of wastewater from
conventional oil and gas
extraction or from hydraulic fracturing (fracking).
But its supply of
conventional oil is shrinking, and
oil sands
extraction has been growing fast in the past decade, from about 700,000 barrels per day in 2000 to 1.7 million today.
Marshall said as things stand, 51 percent of all
oil production in the state is through «tertiary» mechanisms, or enhanced recovery methods targeted in the proposed ban as opposed to
conventional forms of
extraction.
Separate production models were developed for mining (coal and unconventional
oil) and field (gas and
conventional oil) operations, which reflected the basic differences in
extraction and processing techniques.
On the contrary, Figure 1 is a conservative estimate of potential emissions from tar sands because: the economically extractable amount grows with technology development and
oil price; the total tar sands resource is larger than the known resource, possibly much larger;
extraction of tar sands
oil uses
conventional oil and gas, which will show up as additions to the purple bars in Figure 1; development of tar sands will destroy overlying forest and prairie ecology, emitting biospheric CO2 to the atmosphere.
AND as fracking begins to overtake
conventional extraction methods and promise us centuries of cheap fossil gas and
oil, we're only beginning to understand its impact on water and communities.
We have two main concerns: the risk of
oil spills along the pipeline, which would traverse highly sensitive terrain, and the fact that the
extraction of petroleum from the tar sands creates far more greenhouse emissions than
conventional production does.
If combustion of the final products is included, the so - called «Well to Wheels» approach,
oil sands
extraction, upgrade and use emits 10 to 45 % more greenhouse gases than
conventional crude.
WWF says reductions of 85 % would be required to reduce the emissions from tar sands
extraction to be comparable to
conventional oil production.
The region has the capacity to produce 2.5 million barrels of
oil per day — and in the process, as TreeHugger has explained before,
extraction produces up to eight times the emissions of
conventional oil and operators are allowed to use twice the amount of fresh water that all of Calgary uses in a year.
This first step of tar sand
extraction is estimated to result in gasoline that carries a burden of «at least five times more carbon dioxide» then would
conventional «sweet crude»
oil production.
Because the
extraction of bitumen from those sands is an energy - intensive process, it emits more greenhouse gases than the
extraction of
oil from
conventional reservoirs.
But producing
oil sands is a messy, emissions - intensive business; according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the
extraction process produces 82 percent more emissions than
conventional oil drilling.
Van der Veer went on to claim that the «well - to - wheels» carbon footprint of Canadian tar sand
extraction — in which Shell is heavily invested, seeing 74 % profit growth in the second quarter of this year — was only 15 % higher than
conventional sources of
oil.