Competent individuals and sophisticated equipment are on standby to respond to
a conventional oil spill.
Not exact matches
As the lighter portions of the
spill begin to evaporate, the progressively heavier bitumen would likely begin to sink — rendering useless the
conventional clean - up equipment designed to recover floating
oil.
During last year's massive
oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico,
conventional oil - collection techniques were found to be woefully inadequate.
that aimed to spin away some of the criticism they have been facing in the aftermath of this
spill, including claiming that the
oil is conventional crude, not tar sands oil and that they are not benefiting from the Oil Liability Trust Fund loophole that exempts tar sands o
oil is
conventional crude, not tar sands
oil and that they are not benefiting from the Oil Liability Trust Fund loophole that exempts tar sands o
oil and that they are not benefiting from the
Oil Liability Trust Fund loophole that exempts tar sands o
Oil Liability Trust Fund loophole that exempts tar sands
oiloil.
Critics of the TransCanada pipeline have warned of potential
spills in America's heartland as well as the climate impacts of allowing more tar sands
oil, which has a higher carbon footprint than
conventional sources, into the US and other markets.
Although PHMSA records detailed information on all reported pipeline
spills, the database does not distinguish between
spills of diluted bitumen and
conventional oil.
What this
spill revealed was that no one knew the impact of pushing bitumen, unrefined tar sands
oil, through pipes regulated for
conventional oil.
We have two main concerns: the risk of
oil spills along the pipeline, which would traverse highly sensitive terrain, and the fact that the extraction of petroleum from the tar sands creates far more greenhouse emissions than
conventional production does.
But those databases don't specify the exact cause of each
spill, and they don't track whether the pipeline carried dilbit or
conventional crude
oil at the time of the
spill.
Pipeline opponents also worry about
spills, especially because the thick Canadian
oil, known as «diluted bitumen,» or «dilbit,» is different from
conventional crude.
Studies also indicate that pipelines operating at temperatures above 100 degrees Fahrenheit
spill up to 23 times more often due to external corrosion than
conventional oil pipelines.
According to Congress and the IRS, diluted bitumen or dilbit, which is the type of
oil that has spilled in Arkansas, is not classified as oil and companies shipping it are not required to pay an 8 - cents - per - barrel excise tax into the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, as companies shipping conventional oil
oil that has
spilled in Arkansas, is not classified as
oil and companies shipping it are not required to pay an 8 - cents - per - barrel excise tax into the federal Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, as companies shipping conventional oil
oil and companies shipping it are not required to pay an 8 - cents - per - barrel excise tax into the federal
Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, as companies shipping conventional oil
Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, as companies shipping
conventional oil oil do.
If the
oil industry wants to pipe these dangerous tar sands oils over our water sheds and aquifers, putting our drinking supply and neighborhoods at risk, they should not only be required to pay into the cleanup fund, they should be paying far more than the 8 cents per barrel they pay for
conventional oil since these tar sands oils are not just worse for the environment, but potentially pose a greater risk of
spills and are even harder to clean up.
Exxon may indeed end up paying for all of the
oil spill cleanup in Mayflower, but they are not paying the 8 - cents - per - barrel fee for the tar sands
oil, as they would if they were transporting
conventional oil.
Other
conventional crude producers pay 8 cents a barrel to ensure the fund has resources to help clean up some of the 54,000 barrels of pipeline
oil that
spilled 364 times last year.
So again, they consider tar sands
oil just like
conventional oil when it comes to their pipelines, but not when it comes to cleaning the
spills those pipelines create.
Whether it is tar sands
oil, dilbit or
conventional crude,
oil spills are a mess to clean up and the
oil industry should pay a cleanup fee for a barrel of one type of
oil as it does for another.
Following the 2010 Enbridge pipeline dilbit
spill in Michigan, InsideClimate News produced a good primer on the differences between dilbit and
conventional oil:
A new study by the National Academy of Sciences found that «pipelines carrying heavy Canadian
oil sands fuel are at no greater risk of a
spill than those running
conventional crude.»
Lisa Song at InsideClimate News explains why tar sands
spills are harder to clean than
conventional crude
oil:
The issue is important because dilbit behaves differently from
conventional crude
oil when it
spills into water.