The scores of
conventional public school students have largely been static since 2009.
In math, the average score of a charter student was 272, while the average score of
a conventional public school student was 280.
Not exact matches
After all, charters are
public schools too — and their
students have as strong a moral claim on the
public fisc as
conventional pupils.
To address the issue of
student self - selection into charter
schools, the researchers compared high
school and postsecondary outcomes for 8th - grade charter
students who entered charter high
schools with outcomes for 8th - grade charter
students who entered
conventional public high
schools, ensuring that both the comparison group and the treatment group of
students were once charter choosers.
According to
conventional wisdom, the
students Match serves struggle to succeed in
public schools.
That is, we compare high
school and postsecondary outcomes for 8th - grade charter
students who entered charter high
schools (the treatment group) with outcomes for 8th - grade charter
students who entered
conventional public high
schools (the comparison group).
Colorado requires that 95 percent of
students be in a high - risk group before a
school can be labeled an AEC and the D.C. Public Charter School Board is considering a proposal based on a «gap» model that would set the threshold at 60 percent high - risk students, while some other states allow schools to bypass conventional accountability systems if their missions focus on serving alternative student popula
school can be labeled an AEC and the D.C.
Public Charter
School Board is considering a proposal based on a «gap» model that would set the threshold at 60 percent high - risk students, while some other states allow schools to bypass conventional accountability systems if their missions focus on serving alternative student popula
School Board is considering a proposal based on a «gap» model that would set the threshold at 60 percent high - risk
students, while some other states allow
schools to bypass
conventional accountability systems if their missions focus on serving alternative
student populations.
Charters have more flexibility than
conventional public schools in exchange for being held to additional standards to make sure they are meeting their
student goals.
Charter opponents used to claim, without much in the way of evidence, that these
schools would harm
conventional public schools by «cherry - picking» white, high - achieving
students and leaving poor, struggling minority
students behind.
Defenders of the status quo fear charter
schools because they see them as a threat to funding for
conventional public schools, even ones that fail to educate
students.
Every
student deserves a quality elementary, middle and high
school learning experience, but
conventional public schooling isn't always a good fit.
Specifically,
students enrolled in charters in the state - run district made learning gains, on average, almost twice those of their peers in
conventional public schools.
At the same time, the scores of
students at
conventional public schools have remained roughly the same.
The same can be said of a
student moving from a
conventional public school to a charter
school.