Not exact matches
People who are threatened by climate change
science can not provide an alternative
view that is coherent by the standards
of conventional scientific thinking.
If you go to The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe, you invariably hear a bunch
of caricatures
of those who disagree with
conventional wisdom on
science — most
of which truly are quacks, but not always — and they pedantically emphasize how these alternative
views are «not
science»: they have beliefs that do not have peer - reviewed tests supporting a falsifiable hypothesis.
Simply put, a reasonably thoughtful and informed person who reads the Article is unlikely to place any stock in Dr. Ball's
views, including his
views of Dr. Weaver as a supporter
of conventional climate
science.