Not exact matches
If you are a
skeptic like I was, you will be a
convert after the first bite.
The reason progressives constantly obscure the meaning of terms
like skeptic, «global warming,» «AGW» (when you mean CAGW), is so you can
convert your political opinions into «science,» and then falsely label your political opponents as anti-science.
It feels
like someone younger, someone more likely to take the cynical political knife - fighting statements of someone
like Glieck (e.g.
skeptics are anti-science) and
convert them literally (and blindly) to supposed Heartland agenda items
like trying to discourage science teaching.
At the very least, the defense of «hide the decline» and the stridency of AGW proponents have
converted a lot of folks
like me from tacit but completely uninformed believers to somewhat more informed
skeptics.
I find the interpretation of Muller as a
converted skeptic is hardly creditable, even though he
likes to play it up.