The tone may not vary quite as much as it does with fiction work, but you still want to
convey to your reader whether your book is dire serious, tongue - in - cheek, or «a difficult subject made reader friendly.»
Not exact matches
The only other reason I can think of is that she is intentionally being deceptive because she knows that the typical On Faith
reader (secular, liberal, atheistic) isn't going
to know any better, much less care
whether she is accurately
conveying Jesus» meaning.
If, for example, you seek
to convey to readers a sense of teacher salaries, it matters
whether you report beginning salaries or those at the top rung;
whether the focus is on the mean or the median;
whether fringe benefits as well as cash wages are included; and
whether, for perspective, teacher salaries are set alongside the earnings of bus drivers or neurosurgeons.
As
to your excerpts from the article you linked
to — again,
readers can review the article
to determine
whether you adequately
conveyed its points.
LOL... Climate Etc
readers are hereby highly encouraged
to read for themselves the Pontifical Academy's Fate of Mountain Glaciers in the Anthropocene... and then
to judge for themselves
whether TonyB's «selective citations» variously in regard
to CO2, soot, and glaciers
convey any rational content whatsoever... or
whether they amount
to mere denialist quibbles.