All to try and
convince ignorant people, while they are freezing, and the hurricanes all but disappeared, that they are going to melt by exhaling.
In order to
convince ignorant people who have not actually researched the subject it does not help me take your side of the argument.
You are a pawn of the anti-gun movement that has
convinced ignorant people everywhere that «assault weapons» are for sale in the U.S..
Not exact matches
In the meanwhile, that is so far off that it's only ever going to
convince people who believe the same as you do and are as
ignorant about evolution and nature and fossils as you are.
Whether it's the result of careful study or indoctrination, be
convinced that those
people with a differing view are crazy and / or
ignorant at best, irrational heretics bent on the destruction of all you hold dear, perhaps the first hints of the anti-Christ, at worst.
the LAST thing we need is some
ignorant f *** like you going out of your way to
convince people that these ALL of these dogs are DANGEROUS and basically insinuating the breed needs to be exterminated.
All well and good, but if it's a high - profile case, lots of
people may take a passionate interest in it — not excluding involved policemen who are quite
convinced the accused is guilty; and by affinity, non-involved policemen, though
ignorant of the detailed facts of the case, may also be
convinced.
The only
people sneaky greenies are likely to
convince that free - market endorsements are foolish, are other greenies ever more stupid and
ignorant than themselves.
But if you still have some doubts (e.g. why this so obvious reasoning apparently did not
convince some
people who are presumably not complete
ignorants) I recommend that you read this comment and another one made at the blog of Eli Rabett.