All those who have legitimately used their discretion have warned others against copying their example unless they have been
convinced by proof of the validity of their findings.
Not exact matches
Because
by the end of the talk you have
convinced people that you know what a zero knowledge
proof is, and
by the end they will have no idea whatsoever.
«To these He also presented Himself alive after His suffering,
by many
convincing proofs, appearing to them over a period of FORTY DAYS and speaking of the things concerning the kingdom of God.»
You do know that
by your definition of
proof, anyone can be
convinced to believe in anything just cause it makes them feel good (you could now be worshiping LSD if that is what you tested and wanted to have faith in)
And the more this man got shunned and bad - mouthed
by his co-workers, the more
convinced he became that he was being persecuted at work, which was further
proof to him that he was doing the right thing.
Not absolute
proof by no means, but a more than
convincing argument nonetheless.
not easily
convinced; skeptical until shown definite
proof... - Excerpted from Webster's New World Dictionary (1970 edition) As in medicine, theology names a whole field
by one...
«Endeavour then to
convince yourself, not
by increase of
proofs of God, but
by the abatement of your passions.
So who cares about religious people, you can't
convince someone of reality when they fabricate their own, they fabricate their
proof, their facts, best thing is just do your thing and stay way from them as much possible, most of the times they turn more people into atheists than atheists themselves
by the things they say and do anyway, lol so no need for us to do it.
By means of a variety of
proofs convincing to the mind and attractive to the heart, the teaching concerning the divine attributes, the destiny of the soul, and the moral duties of man is much more developed in the Qur» an than anywhere else.
No such people in the underground churches in Communist countries, no addicts who turned a new leaf after encountering Jesus (miraculously, though to what extent this has to be, to be accepted as a
convincing proof by you is unknown), no news site links of such things, nothing!
How does he
convince so many people that he represents faithful «biblical» orthodoxy, using no more than
proof by assertion?
Brusaw is
convinced it can be done, for example
by borrowing tricks used to make bullet -
proof and blast -
proof glass.
The name is offered up as
proof by an older Thanos to
convince a younger version of himself of his identity.
From the basic criteria to
proof that the repayments can be handled, a lender needs to be
convinced by several aspects, so getting loan approval fast is possible even if the credit score is poor.
Many more have
convinced themselves of the same conclusion
by referring to the eastern US as
proof.
To be
convincing, the arguments for climate change need to change from the burden of
proof model to a model whereby a thesis is supported explicitly
by addressing the issue of what the case would have to look like for the thesis to be false, in the mode of argument justification (e.g. Betz 2010).
There is no
convincing evidence found of an atmospheric physicist publishing a
proof otherwise
by experiment or theory since then.
I guess I would suggest two articles for this letter to the editor, «There is no
proof» and «No past, no present» Peopel who flat out deny there is any evidence wo n`t be
convinced but they should be pointed to the IPCC report, the most extensively reviewed scientific document in history, endorsed
by just about every major relevant scientific body and major governmental science academy, including the US.
A 2003 report published
by the National Research Council (NRC) put a damper on the idea of weather modification, saying there was no
convincing scientific
proof that cloud seeding works.
In other words, consensus cues are a form of «social
proof» easily comprehended
by lay people and experts alike — i.e., the proportion of relevant experts who are
convinced by the evidence (e.g., 76 out of 77, or 99 %).
By the rigorous standards of mathematical
proof that are associated to the Clay Institute's Millenium Prize Problem: Navier - Stokes Equation, it is implausible that the climate - change denialists here on Climate Etc will * ever * be
convinced of * any * theoretical analysis, eh?
It is defined differently in different states and jurisdictions, however, most jurisdiction, including California define the civil lawsuit
proof standard as «
by a preponderance of the evidence» for most types of claims and, the slightly higher standard of «clear and
convincing evidence» for claims for punitive damages (damages meant to punish the defendant rather than just compensate the victim).
To meet the burden of
proof in a personal injury case, a plaintiff must prove his or her claim
by a preponderance of the evidence, which means that the plaintiff must present evidence that when weighed
by the judge or the jury, is more
convincing than the defendant's.
The normal standard of
proof in a civil case is, of course,
proof by a preponderance of the evidence, not
proof by clear and
convincing evidence....
Actually [the district court] did commit one clear error on the fiduciary count, and that was to apply the normal civil standard of preponderance of the evidence, rather than the higher standard of
proof —
proof by clear and
convincing evidence — that Illinois requires to establish the existence of a fiduciary duty outside of the per se categories such as lawyer - client and guardian - ward.
By that we mean not merely evidence which might be true and to a considerable extent probably is true, but, as the learned trial judge put it, «evidence which is so
convincing in truth and manifestly reliable that it reaches the standard of
proof beyond reasonable doubt».»
With respect to service
by email on counsel, I will do it with co-operative counsel, though I would really like to know if anyone has ever been able to
convince staff at a registrar's office to accept the admittedly odd provisions of Rule 16.09 (6) for
proof of service
by email.
The courts below erred
by requiring petitioner to make its
proof by clear and
convincing evidence.
By providing
convincing proof of the mistake in the traffic ticket, you may sway the court to favor your side.