CNN's Lou Dobbs is no longer
convinced climate debate is settled — declared belief in global warming is «almost a religion»
Questions Whether Quiet Sun May «Counteract» Global Warming — April 21, 2009 & CNN's Lou Dobbs is no longer
convinced climate debate is settled — declared belief in global warming is «almost a religion»]
Not exact matches
The vast majority of
climate researchers are
convinced by the data that human - caused warming is underway, though spirited
debate surrounds the complex feedbacks in the
climate system.
Whether deciding school policy for an upcoming year or
debating the consequences for an individual student arising from a single incident of misbehavior, educators juggle several factors: striking a balance between an orderly campus and a welcoming
climate conducive to learning; protecting the safety of all students while recognizing the rights of individuals; treating students equitably but, when warranted, considering individual circumstances that influence behavior; and, in concert with every school's educative mission,
convincing students who are behaving badly to correct their behavior while also standing ready to banish anyone who interferes with the learning of others.
It's probably conservatives trying to seize the attack ground in view of a possible pending
debate about
climate change in Washington, but the chorus of denialist opinion is so coordinated and their «logic» so simple it is
convincing many, even among educated people (science PhDs) who can not be bothered to look deep into things but try to form an opinion based on a few journalistic pieces.
And your phrase «you have failed to
convince qualified
climate scientists that your contribution to the
debate has anything relevant and constructive to add» is disingenuous at best.
Governor Brown seemed to want to shut down all
debate, in fact, by labeling anyone not
convinced by reigning
climate - change theories as «troglodytes,» a favorite slur of the governor's when wishing to silence those who disagree with him.
The intention was to
convince the public that there was a raging
debate among
climate scientists about the causes of
climate change.
The draft plan suggests that despite industry efforts to
convince the public that the
climate treaty would be costly to carry out and unfair to the United States, the treaty remains popular partly because environmentalists are winning the
debate on the science.
Cultural Framing of Skeptical and
Convinced Logics in the
Climate Change Debate and his equivocation by using «climate change» for «anthropogenic climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
Climate Change
Debate and his equivocation by using «
climate change» for «anthropogenic climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
climate change» for «anthropogenic
climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic climate change»
climate change» or «catastrophic anthropogenic
climate change»
climate change» etc..
It helped me to realize even stronger that it is the society stakeholder that should be put in the middle of our work, and with respect to this you and your colleagues have echoed a very
convincing and true sound in the
debate around
climate science and its applications.
Cultural Framing of Skeptical and
Convinced Logics in the
Climate Change
Debate, Organization & Environment 24:3 - 33.
Cultural Framing of Skeptical and
Convinced Logics in the
Climate Change
Debate.»
Philosophers have to learn to read, a skill that the
climate debates convinced me is quite underestimated.
«I support [the work of the NIPCC] because I am
convinced that the whole field of
climate and
climate change urgently needs an open
debate between several «schools of thought,» in science and well as other disciplines, many of which jumped on the IPCC bandwagon far too readily.
Climate of Doubt showed that the climate denial movement knows they don't need to win the scientific argument as long as they can convince the public that there is an ongoing scientific debate regarding climate
Climate of Doubt showed that the
climate denial movement knows they don't need to win the scientific argument as long as they can convince the public that there is an ongoing scientific debate regarding climate
climate denial movement knows they don't need to win the scientific argument as long as they can
convince the public that there is an ongoing scientific
debate regarding
climate climate change.
But the report is also disconcerting, because it suggests that the agents of
climate denial have largely succeeded in equating the spread of disinformation with «open
debate» — and in
convincing educators that to teach the uncontested truth about
climate change is to violate the spirit of scientific inquiry.
The policy side of the
climate debate needed that visual to sell the idea of unprecedented, catastrophic damage and
convince Joe of the necessity of Andy Rivkin's «Cap and Ka - Ching».
However, their analysis of expert credibility into two distinct «
convinced» and «unconvinced» camps and the lack of nuance in defining the terms «
climate deniers,» «skeptics,» and «contrarians» both oversimplify and increase polarization within the
climate debate.
«This entire process has been an exercise in re-educating myself about the
climate debate and, in the process, I can honestly say that I have heard very
convincing arguments from all the different sides, and I think I'm actually more neutral on the issue now than I was before I started this project.