Sentences with phrase «convincing arguments in court»

Not exact matches

In the notice of his decision, New York Supreme Court Justice Manuel Mendez supported the arguments made by Schneiderman at the November 25 hearing and did not appear to be sympathetic to or convinced by those of DraftKings or FanDuel attorneys.

With the U.S. Supreme Court to hear arguments 9 December on a case challenging the use of race - conscious admissions at the University of Texas at Austin, a top AAAS official said there is convincing research on the benefits of a diverse student population in science - related fields.

«In a final written brief before the high court hears oral arguments, Delaware's lawyers argued that New Jersey claimed an exclusive right to land under the Delaware River only after BP «convinced them to reverse New Jersey's decades - long policy of cooperation» on boundary - straddling projects along the Delaware River.»

The overall argument made by the press lawyer - which convinced the judge and the court - is that if the third client's name is given to the court as sealed information, it should be public, according to the 1st Amendment and in the public interest.

The reasoning of the Court is not convincing in relation to the first question, which is mainly due to the fact that the court does not provide arguments for its finCourt is not convincing in relation to the first question, which is mainly due to the fact that the court does not provide arguments for its fincourt does not provide arguments for its finding.

On Final Appeal In front of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, the plaintiff made essentially the same arguments as below and convinced the court that the trial judge was proper in increasing the amount of the damages awarIn front of the Supreme Court of South Carolina, the plaintiff made essentially the same arguments as below and convinced the court that the trial judge was proper in increasing the amount of the damages aCourt of South Carolina, the plaintiff made essentially the same arguments as below and convinced the court that the trial judge was proper in increasing the amount of the damages acourt that the trial judge was proper in increasing the amount of the damages awarin increasing the amount of the damages award.

However, in Commission v. Germany, the Commission's case proved to be too weak: While the Court accepted in principle that a less favourable treatment of dividends could constitute an obstacle to the free movement of capital (para 15), it was not convinced by the Commission's arguments.

As the Court observed in Kerr, the argument for retroactive spousal support would be less convincing where a spouse has already enjoyed the advantages he or she would have received from that support.

When you are facing a judge in supreme or family court, you need an attorney by your side that not only knows how to prepare documents, but also knows how to present your best case in court through a convincing oral argument.

The FCA has equally instructed that a brand's successful legal arguments from case1 are to be applied in case 2, unless the second court is «convinced that the prior decision is wrong and can advance cogent reasons in support of this view».

Trial counsel did an admirable job in this case marshalling evidence and responding to Canada's section 1 arguments, but unfortunately as appellants» counsel, we weren't able to convince the Court that an error had been made in the trial judge's section 1 analysis.