Sentences with phrase «convincing evidence exists»

If the misconduct is more serious, and it appears that clear and convincing evidence exists to support the allegations, the case may be more formally investigated.

Paul Re: «don't believe in CAGW / AGW to succesfully oppose mitigation» Your logic ignores those who may «believe» (be convinced evidence exists for) CAGW / AGW, but who oppose «mitigation» for one or more of economic reasons, humanitarian, and moral reasons.

Not exact matches

In the end, Vera Rubin was the first to find convincing evidence that dark matter exists.

You said, «While you may feel certain that God does not exist, yet for the very same level of available evidence, another person is absolutely convinced of the existence of God.

By that, I mean the sort of evidence that would convince you if someone claimed THEIR god existed.

It is the fact that non-functional sequences of dna have been passed down from parent species prior to a split in sub species or classifications and exist on the exact same location within the strand of the other sub species, which was the final evidence convincing me that God did indeed use evolution as His means of creation.

But with the resurrection of Jesus, while we have witnesses and the documents they wrote, it is not so much what they say that convinces us of the historical fact of the resurrection, but the simple fact that such witnesses and documents actually exist which provides the greatest evidence for the resurrection.

Please provide the credible, convincing, verifiable evidence of anything existing beyond our physical world.

1 word By «faith» don't you mean that there is no evidence possible that would convince you that you are wrong in believing God exists?

Moby Schtick, what evidence would convince you that God exists?

Even if you sum up that evidence and are convinced it means god exists it says nothing about who or what god is.

Now, how many of you believers out there are open - minded enough to say that they could be convinced that God doesn't exist given enough evidence, or the right argument?

Here is my version of my atheism: I have yet to see any evidence that convinces me any gods exist at all and quite a bit that convinces me the anthropomorphic all - loving, all - knowing, omnipresent god of the Abrahamic religions does not.

How could «the right evidence» convince someone who is «confident that God doesn't exist»?

No one can prove God's existence, since that would defeat the purpose of life, but I've yet to see anyone offer convincing evidence that he doesn't exist.

Let me ask you a question, hypothetically, would there or could there EVER be enough evidence provided to you to convince you that a god does not exist?

Also, I as an Atheist would tend to believe if evidence was in fact provided... but your assertion that this would never happen is moot because the evidence you speak of that would supposedly convince Atheists of the existence of god does not exist except in your own mind.

God never has and never will use scientifically - proven evidence to convince people; personal agency and faith are more important to Him than trying to prove to every person that He exists or which is His Church.

It requires some degree of faith that you're right, even if you have convinced yourself that empirical evidence doesn't exist.

In the case of Harpur's theory (that Jesus didn't exist, and that deliberate efforts have been made to choose to make the myths interpreted literally), his evidence is not as convincing or as extensive as the evidence for Jesus having been a real person, on whom a certain religious and political systems have been formed and which have embellished, perverted, and developed certain aspects, with intentions both deliberate and unintentional.

Others, like me, are convinced that no theoretical or empirical evidence exists for such a claim, and that a widespread belief in the existence of such a point of no return threatens to push ecological science and its application in the wrong direction.

«There is no convincing evidence that a sufficiently large reservoir of old metabolic carbon existed in some mysterious location in the glacial ocean only to be ventilated during deglaciation,» argues paleoclimatologist Lowell Stott of the University of Southern California, who was not involved in the study.

Pillinger himself has long been convinced that evidence of life on Mars exists.

In April, an investigation at Rutgers University finally concluded that «substantial (clear and convincing) evidence exists that research fraud has occurred in several areas» including «biased selection of subjects who were to be included in the symmetry / asymmetry comparison groups so as to artificially obtain desired results.»

«My book is not an attempt to convince people of the existence of Sasquatch,» the 49 - year - old Meldrum says emphatically; rather it argues that «the evidence that exists fully justifies the investigation and the pursuit of this question.»

«I am convinced that these strange particles exist in these nanowires, but only a non-local measurement establishing the underlying physics can make the evidence definitive.»

To our knowledge, no existing studies offer convincing evidence on the causal effect of G&T programs on student achievement.

Levine does not simply mean that one should not tell the child, «You have disorder X.» His comment in A Mind at a Time, «I have seen no convincing scientific evidence that [Asperger's syndrome] exists as a discrete disorder of some kind like a strep throat» indicates a belief that a diagnostic category must have a clear boundary of symptoms and that the relationship between the cognitive, neural, behavioral, and genetic factors must be understood before the category is useful.

Although Davies says his «analysis is predicated on the assumption that compensatory programs... have fallen short of the buoyant expectations of the mid-1960s,» and notes that even at the time there was a «lack of convincing evidence that federal dollars were improving the quality of American education,» he does not explain why those expectations existed, or why dissenting voices went unheeded.

They are always able to come up with an explanation for any scientific data pointing to the world existing for longer than 6000 years; and they will never be convinced by any evidence because they «know» that come what may the Bible is always true.

If the prosecutor in a criminal trial failed to convince the trier of fact (the judge or jury) that no reasonable doubt existed as to the defendant's guilt, a plaintiff may nevertheless be able to show that it was more likely than not (the definition of a preponderance of the evidence) that the defendant committed the child abuse alleged in a civil trial.

Has the evidence of the Law Society convinced you that there exists not only «some» racism in the professions, that allegation alone requiring relevant and material proof, but that there is «systemic» racism in the professions, i.e., racism everywhere?

(1) If a supplemental petition or a motion for modification of time - sharing and parental responsibility is filed because a parent is activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service and the parent's ability to comply with time - sharing is materially affected as a result, the court may not issue an order or modify or amend a previous judgment or order that changes time - sharing as it existed on the date the parent was activated, deployed, or temporarily assigned to military service, except that a court may enter a temporary order to modify or amend time - sharing if there is clear and convincing evidence that the temporary modification or amendment is in the best interests of the child.

Utah's real estate statute creates a presumption that an independent contractor relationship exists unless there is «clear and convincing evidence that the relationship was intended by the parties to be an employer employee relationship».