Sentences with phrase «convincing evidence in»

Instead, according to the Colorado Supreme Court, criminal defendants seeking a return of funds paid in conjunction with a later - vacated conviction must bring a separate civil suit under a Colorado statute — the Exoneration Act — in which, among other burdens, plaintiffs apparently have to prove their actual innocence by clear and convincing evidence in order to recover.

However there is no convincing evidence in the scientific literature of direct physiological effects occurring at sound levels commonly associated with modern wind turbines

While members of the HF have many times called me a liar they have very rarely made any specific claims that something I wrote was wrong, and have never supplied convincing evidence in support of such claims.

Although there is as yet no convincing evidence in the observed record of changes in tropical cyclone behaviour, a synthesis of the recent model results indicates that, for the future warmer climate, tropical cyclones will show increased peak wind speed and increased mean and peak precipitation intensities.

Finally, given the limitations of climate science (one Earth and all) they should describe what they would consider convincing evidence in favor of the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis.

John Bogle presents convincing evidence in Common Sense on Mutual Funds.

Most promising, TEAC's heavy emphasis on the obligation of teacher - education programs to produce convincing evidence in support of the claims they make about their own quality has the potential to enhance accountability in teacher education.

But now Vilenkin says he has convincing evidence in hand: The universe had a distinct beginning — though he can't pinpoint the time.

Not exact matches

In the end, Vera Rubin was the first to find convincing evidence that dark matter exists.

In true infectious style, everyone suddenly became convinced single - use retail bags were a scourge on the environment and evidence our consumer lifestyle was out of control.

Overall our default perspective probably ought to be against mergers - we should require abundant and specific evidence of large potential gains to convince us that a particular merger is in the best interest of anyone other than management and the investment bankers constructing the deal.

In order to wiretap Cohen, federal investigators would have to have convincing evidence that there is a possibility of an ongoing crime; wiretaps additionally all require approval from a federal judge.

In short, there is no convincing evidence that the U.S. economy, or the global one, has hit bottom.

Alan Greenspan was importantly right when he ignored models and maintained easy policy in the mid 1990s because of other more anecdotal evidence that convinced him that productivity growth had accelerated.

As I had these conversations with the programmers and entrepreneurs who are most deeply involved in Bitcoin, I encountered a quiet but widely held belief that much of the most convincing evidence pointed to a reclusive American man of Hungarian descent named Nick Szabo.

The document explores how Switzerland could offer the blockchain community huge potential as a place in which this technology can be developed and used, of which the prominence of Zug's Crypto Valley provides the most convincing evidence.

Even more convincing is the increasing body of evidence suggesting that over the last generation, various factors have increased the propensity of populations in developed countries to save and reduced their propensity to invest.

The most convincing evidence about presidential election years for Evans is that in 18 of the last 22, the S&P 500 indexhas had a positive return for the year and has posted an average return of 11 percent in those years.

In one case, a borrower's testimony about her mental impairment, including evidence that she received Social Security benefits, was enough to convince the court of undue hardship.

Suffice it to say that the improvement in new unemployment claims strikes me as a legitimately hopeful development, but there is too much short - term noise, and inconsistency with other economic evidence (reliable leading indicators, falling tax withholdings) to draw a convincing signal.

No amount of scientific data or evidence would ever convince them that it wasn't God that put the tornado in their path... they just see it as God challenging them.

I said it to hotair already, but I will expand it a bit for you: what is evidence for some is not accepted by everyone; just as in a court case, some jurors are convinced with very little evidence while some people can not be convinced of something no matter how much evidence there is... much of this comes from how you were raised and your own personal world view, for many people God does not fit into their world view so whatever evidence there is they close their eyes and say, «No, I don't believe that!»

«As a magistrate, I have to act on the evidence before me and quite simply, I believe that there is not sufficient evidence to convince me that placing a child in the care of a same - sex couple can be as holistically beneficial to a child as placing them with a mum and dad as God and nature intended.

On the evidence he presents, in the form of quotations and accounts of various incidents, the characterization is convincing.

For example, there are people in all religions who use it to convince themselves they have evidence their religious beliefs are correct, even when their beliefs conflict with those of other religions, whose followers also claim they have evidence their beliefs are correct.

3 — While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some id iot rolling around on the floor speaking in «tongues» may be all the evidence you need to «prove» Christianity.

If a person completely believes a fact, for example that a chair can hold their weight, because of the evidence provided surely other evidence that is contrary to his initial conclusion could convince him otherwise, that the chair would not in fact hold his weight?

There is not enough evidence in the entire Bible to convince me of that.

It is the fact that non-functional sequences of dna have been passed down from parent species prior to a split in sub species or classifications and exist on the exact same location within the strand of the other sub species, which was the final evidence convincing me that God did indeed use evolution as His means of creation.

It needs to be emphasised that there is convincing evidence for God in nature (Romans 1:19).

I have yet to see any convincing evidence of prophecy in the Bible.

whoa there buddy... you're in a Belief Blog... there's no room for credible, convincing, verifiable evidence around here.

The claim is like claiming that the most convincing evidence for [magic agency] is the unreasonable fun in computer games.

There is no convincing evidence that He was called «God» in the first century, and indisputable evidence that He was not generally called by that name; but it is clear that He was thought of as being related to God as no other man could be.

1 word By «faith» don't you mean that there is no evidence possible that would convince you that you are wrong in believing God exists?

He called them evidence of God's «alien work,» which brought Luther the human being to his limits; he believed that only there, in experiencing those limits, could he be convinced to throw himself into the arms of the One he otherwise refused to trust.

When I say «I see no evidence for any God / gods and the evidence we do have proves a global flood did not occur as the bible claims» when asked by a believer why I don't believe, it might look very similiar to an anti-theist who is attempting to convince you to quit believing in God.

In a statement released on Tuesday, the US State Department said: «We have seen no credible evidence that Mr Brunson is guilty of a crime and are convinced that he is innocent.»

A study such as Pastoral Care in Historical Perspective gives convincing evidence that the church at its best has always had a vital interest in what we now call mental health.

The deposit of revelation is said to be finished or fixed, but this can be a salvific teaching only if it means that there is sufficient evidence in our past history to convince us that we live within the horizon of a promise which by its nature always looks to the future for fulfillment.

And despite the authority that population «scientists» today lend to the worldwide effort to promote birth control, convincing evidence that voluntaryfamily planning programs have resulted in sustained changes in fertility norms is still lacking.

The evidence Phillips marshals in support of his thesis is convincing and disturbing.

While we disagree on whether the evidence for that miracle is convincing, Brown, myself and the apostle Paul are in complete agreement on this at least: that if Christ has not been raised, our faith is in vain.

3 — While modern science, history, geology, biology, and physics have failed to convince you otherwise, some id iot rolling around on the floor speaking in «tongues» may be all the evidence you need to «prove» catholicism 2 — You define 0.01 % as a «high success rate» when it comes to answered prayers.

It's tiring and frustrating trying to convince someone of something like a big bang theory or theory of evolution when they won't believe the evidence staring them in the face (care to tell me why god gave us appendixes?)

It is common for people to say that there is much about the resurrection of Jesus that they do not profess to understand, but that the evidence makes it clear that something of a unique and miraculous order occurred, which had the effect of leaving the tomb of Jesus empty, and of convincing the disciples that Jesus was alive in some real sense.

If I were convinced there was no evidence for God I would certainly not pretend to believe in him because I hold some fidestic intuition that I have labeled «faith.»

Although Simon the Zealot (so called to distinguish him from Simon Peter) was one of the disciples (Luke 6:15; Acts 1:13), he does not figure prominently in the Gospel narrative, and there is no convincing evidence that Jesus had anything to do with the Zealot movement.

There is a good deal of evidence, still continuing in the later and more developed narratives, which suggests that the Easter faith did not come to birth within the disciples as a result of one, sudden, epoch - making and fully convincing disclosure.

See the diffidence concerning the ability of modern knowledge of nature to be convincing evidence for God referred to in our review of Paul Haffner's quality book and our Cutting Edge column, as well its presence on our Letters» page.