Sentences with phrase «convincing evidence linking»

Not all of these claims are backed by science, but there is convincing evidence linking magnesium supplementation to a lower risk of type 2 diabetes.

Not all of these claims are backed by science, but there is convincing evidence linking magnesium supplementation to a lower risk of type 2 diabetes.

Not exact matches

The report said there had been no convincing evidence that the consumption of khat is linked to any medical or social harm, and found that to control it as a Class C drug would be «disproportionate».

But after reviewing all the evidence, Daviglus and her fellow panelists concluded that it «failed to provide convincing evidence» of the link, whereas other researchers see «some evidence» of a link.

In a linked editorial, Professor Peter Sly, deputy director of the executive of the Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia says the study presents convincing evidence that prenatal exposure to pollution has long - term effects on lung function of children.

This metaphor implies a link between moral disgust and more primitive forms of disgust related to toxicity and disease, yet convincing evidence for this relationship is still lacking.

«We did not find convincing evidence» of a link between being put under and MCI, Sprung says.

The evidence linking physical activity with slower cognitive decline is convincing, says Dr. Steinerman.

This may be up for debate, but nonetheless the link below contains convincing evidence:

There is still convincing evidence red meat and processed meats are linked to colorectal cancer and heart disease and diabetes risk.

He is entitled of course to his own opinion as to which studies he finds convincing — although it bears mention that even the author of some of Justice Thomas» preferred studies has found some evidence linking integrated learning environments to increased academic achievement.

Now, since you probably don't accept anything in the IPCC report link, why don't you answer my question: what evidence would convince you that doubling the CO2 in our atmosphere is a dangerous thing to do?

Ice core research has already provided convincing evidence of human - caused climate change by demonstrating a carbon dioxide - climate link.

Since you are convinced that a «climate disaster» is inevitable, despite the fact that no known mechanism has been identified linking a warming climate with any singular weather event, nor even any correlating evidence showing an increase in storm numbers or intensities as we have been warming, what is the point of a rational discussion?

There is no convincing objective evidence linking wind turbines to health - effects, so Ms Laurie relies almost entirely on anecdotal evidence, of which she has collected a large amount.

To Illustrate the Point: During the run - up of the 2003 Iraq invasion, main - stream polls said that 75 % of Americans were sure that Saddam had WMD's & was linked w Al - Qaeda RE 9 - 11 - which implies that only 25 % in the US either doubted it or at - least were NOT fully convinced & that more evidence was need to make a conclusive decision.

Ideas linking changes in the polar vortex to global warming are not supported by any evidence that I find convincing.

I'm an mild AGW skeptic myself (like Willis; it's not a religion and you could convince me otherwise with good evidence), but I've been following «The Science of Doom» blog recently (found via a link on Climate Audit):

I'm not going to be able to convince you that paid links don't work; because you're seeing evidence to the contrary.