No laboratory tests or
convincing field studies seem to have been carried out once, let alone repeated by independent researchers.
Not exact matches
But the real dearth — the lack of clear pathways into careers that could enable today's generation of gifted young Americans to become the researchers who make tomorrow's great discoveries — is
convincing more and more of the nation's best students not to seek careers in
fields such as law, finance, medicine and other
fields that offer much better short - and long - term career prospects instead of dedicating an average of seven years to PhD
study plus an additional five years or more of postdoctoral training now considered necessary to compete for an academic career in many scientific
fields.
«By taking into account the large amount of data presented and the scarce information available up to date, we are
convinced that it will open a new perspective in the research of mitochondrial DNA - related diseases, as well as in population
studies, and evolutionary and forensic
field,» concludes research director Maria Pilar Aluja.
Secondarily the traditional medical
field is very ultra-conservative and they want to see
study after
study after more
study and then
studies that don't refute the prior
studies, so they're a very ultra-conservative, blinkers on group that's very difficult to
convince.
A
study (http://resources.irregularclimate.com/docs/expert-credibility-in-climatechange.pdf) Published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences confirms what people who have been paying attention already know: 97 — 98 % of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the
field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and (ii) the relative climate expertise and scientific prominence of the researchers unconvinced of ACC are substantially below that of the
convinced researchers.
And it brings us rather
convincing evidence, in a
field where claims and representations (not to speak of copious discussions of what other people happen to have said) are more readily found than data and
studies to substantiate claims.