«I predict that due to the loss of these atmospheric whirlpools, the average temperature on Jupiter will change by as much as 10 degrees Celsius, getting warmer near the equator and
cooler at the poles,» says Marcus.
«I predict that due to the loss of these atmospheric whirlpools, the average temperature on Jupiter will change by as much as 10 degrees Celsius, getting warmer near the equator and
cooler at the poles,» says Marcus.
Whilst cold water can sink as its density increases, say as it is
cooled at the poles, warm water can not do this.
The oceans are warmed at the equator and
cooled at the poles.
While Willis» linear approx may be good enough for rough estimate with small variations, with ampified warming /
cooling at the poles where cold waters will be providing a CO2 sink the effect could be much greater.
Not exact matches
Frame by frame, I could watch
cool, dark spots moving along with Zeta And as it rotated; meanwhile, an even larger spot sat anchored
at its visible
pole.
The Congressional briefing, «Living
at the Extremes: Geoscience Research
at the
Coolest Places on Earth,» planned by AAAS in collaboration with the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in celebration of National Oceans Month, explored the implications that the Earth's
poles have for our natural environment, oceans, and national security.
As the material
cools, the nanomagnets are ordered according to the interactions of their
poles at the vertices.
On January 10, 2006, astronomers using the infrared Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy (CHARA) Array announced that Vega rotates so fast (
at around 91 percent of its «break - up rate») that it is
cooler as well as 23 percent wider along its equator than
at its
poles due to the gravitational effect of its «middle bulge» (NOAO press release; AAS 207 session summary); and Aufdenberg et al, 2006).
Moreover, strong darkening observed around Vega's equator indicates that the star's surface
at the equator is around 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit (2,300 ° Kelvin)
cooler than
at its
poles.
Vega rotates so fast that it is
cooler as well as wider
at its equator than
at its
poles (more).
If something triggers a
cool spell, such as an orbital variation reducing incident sunlight, then water freezes
at the
poles, which increases the Earth's albedo, while the
cooler oceans absorb more CO2, reducing the greenhouse effect.
So when you transport enormous amounts of warm tropical waters to the
poles for about 400,000 years, you end up with ice ages, which after a while may shut down the MOC again, further increasing the polar
cooling, as for instance happened
at the Younger Dryas.
Based on the cycle, it would suggest that we are heading into another Ice Age period of
cooling where global temperatures will drop and ice will again form heavily
at the
poles.
One day, no matter what we do, this
cool period we're in now will end and we'll have to contend with palm trees on the North Slope and in Siberial, and NO Ice
at the
poles.
Ocean surface heat and anomalous warmth
at the
poles were deciding factors for the new September record with very few regions of the global ocean surface showing
cooler than average temps and with extraordinary heat
at the
poles, especially in Antarctica.
Even though the average temperature stayed the same, there were still regional changes, with
cooling in the tropics and warming
at both
poles (particularly in their respective winters):
More warm water from the tropics flows
at the surfce to the
poles where it
cools and sinks.
This snowpack accumulation near the
poles, which gets its water via the Arctic and Antarctic oceans, that in turn rob it from equatorial latitudes of our oceans, also results in a reduction in the earth's spin axis moment of inertia and causes the spin rate to increase as evidenced in the recent history of the rate
at which Leap Seconds are added to our calendar (see Wysmuller's Toucan Equation for more on this evidence that during this warm time with much greater polar humidity, earlier seasonal, later seasonal and heavier snows are beginning to move water vapor from the oceans to the
poles to re-build the polar ice caps and lead us into a global
cooling, while man - made CO2 continues to increase http://www.colderside.com/faq.htm).
Birkeland currents are interesting, although they seem to be a possible correction to direct solar irradiance only
at the
poles and only in the ionosphere, which is already enormously hot — between 1500C and 2500C — but so tenuous that you wouldn't feel heat if you stuck your arm out into the near vacuum of the ionosphere, you'd feel intense
cooling as your blood started to boil and ordinary thermometers would radiate heat away faster than they would equilibrate (and hence would read very cold temperatures).
Cold water
at the
poles dissolves atmospheric oxygen,
cools even more, and sinks to the bottom, slowly moving to the equator, carrying the dissolved oxygen.
In contrast, during the summer
at high latitudes, the troposphere warms significantly as a result of the long hours of daylight; however, owing to the oblique angle of the sunlight near the
poles, the temperatures there remain relatively
cool compared with middle latitudes.
Such events have been occurring in both hemispheres so it is likely that the observed
cooling trend is occurring
at both
poles.
The melting ice would
cool ocean surfaces
at the
poles even more.
The second is a temperature driven process where cold water sinks
at the
poles cooling the deep ocean.
My conclusion is that a careful observation of weather patterns over the entire globe and, in particular, ascertaining whether there is a net average surface movement of air towards the
poles or towards the equator should reveal whether there is an overall global warming or
cooling trend
at any particular time.
The bone I am picking
at is that heat moving elsewhere toward the
pole does not improve on the earth's
cooling in and of itself.
As it's more moist in the tropics, the air
cools at a slower rate compared to the
poles.
7 Tropical wet; tropical wet / dry a) Sub climates Humid Tropical Moist mid-latitude Sub climates Tropical wet; tropical wet / dry a) Sub climates Severe winters; humid continental, sub - arctic / mild winters; humid subtropical, marine west coast, Mediterranean b) Location Close to equator and in ITCZ Severe winters: interiors and eastern coasts of continents, close to
poles; mild winters: along water
at edges of continents c) Features Hot / rainy year round; hot with wet and dry seasons; tropical rain forests and grasslands c) Features: severe winters: cold winters, hot / humid summers except in sub-arctic; mild winters: hot, muggy or
cool summers depending on coastal position, and mild winters with mostly rain.
given a past where the world was a snowball and much
cooler, given a past when there were allegators
at the north
pole, What EXACTLY does the theory predict for the next 10, 20, 30 years?
The oceans
at the
poles absorb CO2 from the atmosphere where the water is
cool enough for the CO2 to stay in solution, then the
cool water returns the CO2 rising
at the equatorial warmer waters where the CO2 is then released.
I can see isolated cases as compression
at the
poles and other curiosities but not on the average, and besides, even with those effects the temperature gradient is rarely actually inverted so in a net sense that is only slowing the
cooling of the surface
at the expense of equal
cooling in the atmosphere which ends in a greater temperature gradient therefore a greater flux of energy upward to space.
The Argo floats went in search of a and found only a heating plateau (after adjusting the initial
cooling upwards), b stopped in 1995, c never happened
at all, d also went the opposite to predictions, with e only one of the
poles warmed and the other
cooled and f, according to Lindzen, is demonstrably untrue.
Although warming is most noticeable
at the
poles, higher latitudes are still among the
coolest spots around.