However, tropical storms cool the ocean surface through mixing with
cooler deeper ocean layers and through evaporation.
Not exact matches
Essentially, the researchers found that
deeper warm water is increasingly mixing with the
cool layer of water that traditionally lies atop the eastern part of the Arctic
Ocean.
One, which the authors themselves note, is that the warming of the Arctic
Ocean that is already happening could trap nutrients in
deeper,
cooler layers that would make them less available to feed algae blooms.
Second, physically there is absolutely no problem for wind changes to
cool the upper
ocean at the same time as they warm the
deeper layers.
Even assuming that the dataset is comprehensive: Considering that the upper -
ocean cooling is seen mainly at 30N and 30S, another explanation for this
cooling is increased
ocean — to — atmosphere heat transfer in these regions (possibly aided by hurricane - mixing of the upper
ocean layer, and advection of
deeper cold water as a result).
BBD wrote: «So why isn't the
deep ocean cooling as energy is transferred to the upper
ocean layer» ---------------------------------------- For the same reason as ice floats
So why isn't the
deep ocean cooling as energy is transferred to the upper
ocean layer?
When the
ocean surface is
cooler, warmth is taken from the surface into
deeper ocean layers that «do not emit heat out of the planet».
Empirically, certain phases of ENSO are known to be associated with trends at the
ocean surface that are the reverse of those at
deeper layers, consistent with the notion that a positive surface warming is at times an
ocean cooling event.
Either this is a truism (the sun must be heating the
ocean surface first) or it is meant to take into account the complex circulations that occur in the
ocean, like the Gulf Stream's involvement in a vertical rise of waters from
deep ocean layers in one region and sinking of the
cooled surface waters as the stream reaches its northern limit.
The existence of that
cooler layer is evidence that the rate of evaporation is the primary influence on variability in the rate of
ocean energy loss (apart from internal
ocean circulation variability which is not relevant here) and it follows that more evaporation for the same rate of conduction and radiation (from a stable temperature differential) will send that
cooler layer deeper and / or intensify the temperature differential between it and the
ocean bulk below.
Indeed, the faster the rate of evaporation the
deeper the level of temperature discontinuity will go and / or the larger the temperature differential will be between the
cooler layer and the
ocean bulk below.
This leads to a thin (1 mm
deep)
layer of
cooler water over the
oceans worldwide and below the evaporative region that is some 0.3 C
cooler than the
ocean bulk below.
Of course, if the air were to be warmer than the
ocean surface then evaporation would take the extra energy required from the air rather than the water and that 1 mm
deep layer (0.3 C
cooler than the
ocean bulk) would rise to the surface and dissipate but that doesn't happen often or for long.
In that diagram that top
layer 1 mm
deep and 0.3 C
cooler than the
ocean bulk remains day and night with no apparent change.
It can not do so because the 1 mm
deep layer above the
ocean bulk and 0.3 C
cooler than the
ocean bulk below (the subskin) effectively insulates the skin
layer from the
ocean bulk.
The existence of that persistent subskin
layer 1 mm
deep and 0.3 C
cooler than the
ocean bulk below is observational evidence that whatever goes on in the atmosphere has no effect on the natural background upward energy flow.
I'm not aware of observations that show that
deep ocean layers have
cooled over the last 50 years.
What will happen to the 1 mm
deep cooler layer between the Knudsen
layer and the
ocean bulk?
If the energy was rising from the
deeper ocean layers then they would be *
cooling * but OHC in the
deep ocean is also increasing.
In such events, the
oceans become stratified, with warm
layers acting as «lid» on
deeper,
cooler water.