More specifically, Crockenberg and Leerkes's (2003) model suggests that child temperamental reactivity may adversely affect
coparenting only in conjunction with other risk factors related to family members or family contexts and may even positively affect coparenting when such risk factors are absent.
That is, parent - rated negative emotionality in preschoolers was associated with lower observed and self - reported supportive
coparenting only in families reporting higher levels of postnatal marital adjustment.
Not exact matches
Finally,
only in Stright and Bales» (2003) study on families with preschoolers, no significant role of children's difficult temperament in the quality of
coparenting (supportive and unsupportive
coparenting; observations or self - reports) was detected (r < −.18, ns).
Our review of the literature yielded
only one finding that was inconsistent with the hypothesis that a reactive temperament is directly associated with more adverse
coparenting: Davis et al. (2009) reported a negative association between temperamental difficulty (see above; father rating at 3.5 months) and observed undermining
coparenting behavior (both parents; r = −.33, p <.05).
As
only few studies have directly investigated the association between parental anxiety and
coparenting, we will, first, briefly review the literature on how adult anxiety affects marital functioning; second, how parental anxiety affects parenting behavior; and, third, turn to the relation between parental anxiety and
coparenting.
More specifically, maternal pessimism about the future
coparenting relationship was negatively associated with postpartum observed
coparenting cohesion (consisting of cooperation, competition, and family warmth), but
only in families with highly reactive infants (r = −.63, p <.05).
However, the divorced families who can not or will not
coparent are the
only ones affected by the SPI.
The MCP was identified as a
coparent in 75 % of the families, an additional
coparent was identified in
only 30 % of the families, and, when the MCP did not serve as a
coparent, another individual was identified in this role in
only 24 % of the families.
It was hypothesized that parental flexibility and self - control would not
only explain significant variance in
coparenting quality, but also act as moderators attenuating anticipated relationships between marital functioning and coparental process.
The main results show that (a) mothers promote family integrity in stepfamilies either with the partner, or with the father, but not with both; (b) the older the child, the less the mothers reported integrity with the father in both families, and the more they reported disparagement against the partner and conflict with the partner in stepfamilies; and (c) maternal marital satisfaction is linked with all dimensions of
coparenting with the father in first - marriage families, but
only with disparagement against the partner and conflict with the partner in stepfamilies.
However, self - reported measures of the quality of
coparenting behaviors
only provide access to each parent's individual perceptions about these relational phenomena.
The results globally indicated that
only coparenting support was a significant mediator.
Moreover,
only the links between depressive symptoms in mothers at 3 months postpartum and their own report of the presence of symptoms in the child 18 months later was mediated by
coparenting support.
As expected, the average score for conflict was in the lower range of the scale, and most families (n = 36, 52.9 %) obtained the lowest score on the conflict scale, whereas
only three families (4.4 %) showed the highest level of
coparenting conflict during the triadic play.
The results showed that
coparenting support mediated the links between parental depressive symptoms and child symptoms, but
only for mothers: Maternal depressive symptoms were linked with lower
coparenting support, which in turn predicted increased psychofunctional symptoms and behavior problems assessed by mothers.