If you sell fewer than 1500
copies at a traditional publisher, you're generally considered a commercial disaster by any publisher but a very, very tiny one who paid you an advance less than $ 1000.
Not exact matches
Compelling cover
copy is a key component of any successful self - publishing plan, but many
traditional publishers will let you try your hand
at it as well, so why not present your editor with something that will satisfy you both?
What comes under «marketing» by
traditional publishers is shelf placement (sort of like cereal manufacturers purchase shelf placement
at grocery stores), a listing in the
publisher's catalog, and review
copies to reviewers.
No
copy editing is done in - house
at a
traditional publisher.
I've discussed before the difference between editing,
copy editing and proofing, but judging by the fact that someone over
at ATH asked about how writers were going to get the excellent editing and other services that
traditional publishers provide in the new indie publishing, I'm going to presume that I either haven't gotten through or that I need a boomier amplifier.
Traditional publishers, take note: I'd have to be crazy to «rent» your e-book
at $ 7.99 when I can own a transferable
copy for around $ 1.50 less than that.
However, as Mark Coker argues, compared to many indie authors who can get $ 1.80 - $ 2.10 out of each
copy of their ebooks sold
at the price of $ 2.99, those authors who publish through the
traditional publishers are «
at an extreme disadvantage» because they earn only $ 1.25 - $ 1.75 out of each
copy of their ebooks sold
at the price of $ 9.99.