Sentences with phrase «copyrighted works as»

We did not license Post Media or Rogers or any of the newspapers our listings were marketed on with similar copyright license agreements either so those ads have remained our copyrighted works as do the listings still stored on TREB servers.

The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation of the copyrighted work as a whole;

Section 107 calls for consideration of four factors in evaluating a question of fair use: (i) the purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; (ii) the nature of the copyrighted work; (iii) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole and (iv) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

Not exact matches

Works that are nothing more than common property and contain no original authorship — such as standard calendars or rulers — can't be protected by copyright.

In other words, once your story is put in writing, your song is transcribed as sheet music or recorded, or your creative work is given some fixed form, your copyright is automatically secured.

It's sometimes confusing as to exactly who is the owner of a work's copyright protection.

Copyright applies to creative works such as books and movies (and this column), but also to software, which at its core is another form of writing, albeit in code.

If that doesn't work, you can engage in SEO sabotage: purchasing links to the offending website that appear on a site that's already in the search engine's doghouse for violations such as keyword stuffing, machine - generated pages, or copyright violation.

Much as it is possible for someone to get rewarded for performing a work — as opposed to writing it, which involves copyright — publishers would get to command fees for the stuff their writers write, based their own (new) rights rather than the copyright held by the journalist.

Changes to copyright law in 1998 greatly extended the rights of authors and, as a result, few works entered the public domain in the United States for two decades.

While some rights holders have argued that the standard for a substantial is very low (the National Post recently argued in a case that «even the reproduction of a small number of words in a newspaper article can be an impermissible reproduction»), the Copyright Board says that its preliminary view is that «copying of a few pages or a small percentage from a book that is not a collection of short works, such as poems, is not substantial.»

It offers an oppor - tunity to study systematically the interaction of several copyright issues: including the rights (or lack thereof) of exclusive licensees as plaintiffs in parallel import situations, the distinction between exclusive licensees and assignees, the nature of works of authorship, the characteristics of copy - right infringement, the status of copyrightable works when used as trade - marked logos, the limits (if any) of concurrent copyright and trade - mark protection, and even the distinction between trade - mark, copyright, and patent as autonomous yet related legal regimes.

The Company web site contains copyrighted material, trademarks and other proprietary information, including, but not limited to, text, software, photos, video, graphics, music and sound and the entire content of the web site is copyrighted as a collective work under UK and International copyright laws.

The work is also freely available in MP3 format as an audiobook through Librivox, a volunteer online project to make out - of - copyright works available in audio format, at Librivox.org.

The work is also freely available in MP3 format as an audiobook through Librivox, a volunteer project to make out - of - copyright works available in audio format, at Librivox.org.

Public domain refers to the body of creative works and knowledge in which no person, government or organization has any proprietary interest such as a copyright.

So now you have the basics of copyright and defamation as they relate to issues in food blogging, how do you protect your own work?

You can use copyright material without the owner's permission, as long as it is for review or criticism and «a significant acknowledgment of the work is made.»

If you believe that your work has been copied and is accessible on this Site in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, you may notify the Action Network Group by providing the following information (as required by the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. scopyright infringement, you may notify the Action Network Group by providing the following information (as required by the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sCopyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sCopyright Act, 17 U.S.C. sec. 512):

Except as expressly authorized by us, you agree not to modify, rent, distribute, lease, loan, sell or exploit for any commercial purpose any portion of the Service, use of the Service, or access to the Service, and not to create derivative works based on the Service, in whole or in part for your personal, non-commercial use only, provided you keep intact all copyright and other proprietary notices.

This Website contains copyrighted material, trademarks and other proprietary information, including, but not limited to, text, software, photos, video, graphics, music, sound, and the entire contents of OrlandoStrollerRentals.com protected by copyright as a collective work under the United States copyright laws.

They could make more of their catalogue available and support simplification of licensing, such as provision for licensing of orphan works and making it easier for more deals to be struck through a Digital Copyright Exchange.

As one response, some corporate copyright owners have attempted to use digital rights management software to control how owners of copies of individual works can use them, sparking in turn what is essentially a worldwide citizen revolt.

Thus the difficult point was to weigh the interests of copyright owners, who occasionally spend hundreds of millions (as in the case of Hollywood movies) to create their works, and who have a right for setting the price of the products of these investments as well as a legal right that that right is enforced by the state.

Mr Weatherley has previously worked as vice-president for Europe at the Motion Picture Licensing Company, which enforces copyright for the film industry, and as financial controller of the Pete Waterman Group, the entertainment company behind singers such as Kylie Minogue.»

Each entrant certifies, through submission to the contest, that the entry is his or her own original creative work and does not violate or infringe the creative work of others, as protected under copyright law.

They claim that, according to U.S. copyright law, the Neuron manuscript is a «work made for hire,» which the law defines as «a work prepared by an employee within the scope of his or her employment.»

Therefore, the motion states, «[u] nder basic copyright law, as joint owners of the copyright in the original work, the Defendants had carte blanche to use as much or as little of the original work in subsequent works.»

As defined by Brown University in its copyright policy, however, «[c] opyrightable works of scholarly research, course materials or artistic works made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rworks of scholarly research, course materials or artistic works made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rworks made by faculty members would not be considered Works Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.&rWorks Made for Hire and are the property of the author or authors.»

The 186 member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization came to a historic agreement to remove copyright obstacles that have hampered the global availability of textbooks and other published works in accessible formats such as braille, large print and audio.

Everyone could enforce their copyright in the collection of their words and other «works», or in their own life as art.

Subscription - based music download services such as this depend on the copyright owner giving permission for their work to be distributed in this way.

Additionally, a small number of national copyright laws confers attribution to what UK legislation defines loosely as «the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken.»

Also, intellectual creative work is protected by copyright law, including the right to prevent others from modifying it without consent and the moral right of an author to be named as such (European IPR Helpdesk, 2013).

Except as explicitly stated on the Site, the entirety of the Site Materials (including without limitation text, graphics, images, video, data, design, organization, compilation, look and feel attributes and other intellectual property) are the Endocrine Society's copyrighted works, all rights reserved, or they are the copyrighted works of the Endocrine Society's affiliates, licensors, or suppliers.

The Endocrine Society also owns a copyright in the Site as a collective work and compilation, and in the selection, coordination, arrangement, and organization of the Site Materials.

The entire contents of the website and the technology underlying, including but not limited to text, graphics, images, audio files, videos, digital downloads, data compilation, or code is copyrighted as a collective work under the United States and other copyright laws, and is the property of WellnessMama.com and is protected by copyright and other intellectual property or proprietary rights.

The entire content included in this site, including but not limited to text, graphics or code is copyrighted as a collective work under the United States and other copyright laws, and is the property of Integrative Health Care, P.C..

The entire content included in this site, including but not limited to text, graphics or code is copyrighted as a collective work under the United States and other copyright laws, and is the property of Activation Products.

Copyright The entire content included in this site, including but not limited to text, graphics or code is copyrighted as a collective work under the United States and other copyright laws, and is the property of Perfect SupplemeCopyright The entire content included in this site, including but not limited to text, graphics or code is copyrighted as a collective work under the United States and other copyright laws, and is the property of Perfect Supplemecopyright laws, and is the property of Perfect Supplements, LLC.

And this particular work — it was authored in 1823; any work authored prior to 1923 is available as «fair use» to the public (free to use without permission); even according to current copyright laws and as for any work, copyright expiration occurs 70 years after the author's death — in this case the author died in 1863, meaning his copyright would have expired (if applying current laws) in 1933.

A French court found Laneil guilty in a landmark case that recognised French design originals as «real works of art... entitled to the same protection accorded authors and copyright holders.»

promotes or enables unauthorized copying of another person's copyrighted work, such as providing computer programs or links to them, providing information to circumvent manufacture - installed copy - protect devices, or providing music or links to music files;

Judi Dench as Queen Victoria Copyright: BBC Films Perfect World Pictures Working...

In this lesson, students learn about copyright laws as they relate to the use of music by working with a team and researching actual court cases ab...

Copyright protects any piece of original work as soon as it has been recorded either on paper, in an audio recording, on film, or electronically (including on the Web).

As stated in the Harvard University Annual Copyright Disclosure, all Harvard users must respect the copyrights in works that are accessible through computers connected to the Harvard network.

[I] t has been the prevailing academic practice to treat the faculty member as the copyright owner of works that are created independently and at the faculty member's own initiative for traditional academic purposes.

She is an experienced teacher with postgraduate qualifications in education leadership, and believes that «As a teacher, you work within a set of rules and guidelines about accessing copyrighted material in the process of teaching your students.

One way of doing this is by encouraging students to explore mashups, particularly by working with openly - licensed content — content that isn't copyrighted — as they do so.