We examined changes in
coral skeletal growth rates and partial mortality scars [11] to investigate the impact of the bleaching event in 2004 [16] on corals from different temperature variability regimes.
This provides the strongest evidence yet in favor of a biologically - controlled
coral skeletal growth, the team reports today in Science.
Not exact matches
Now, scientists have suggested that
corals have some active control over their
skeletal growth — and that it may protect them from the worst ravages of ocean acidification.
To date, studies of aragonitic, scleractinian CWC responses to ocean acidification have frequently examined short - term acclimation, with effects on
coral bio-mineralization,
growth, and
skeletal strength only becoming evident in experiments run for periods of a year or more (e.g., Tittensor et al., 2010).
Strontium staining was used as a proxy for
coral growth rates, and
skeletal samples were taken for boron isotope analysis.
However, apparently only the more severe bleaching events cause a reduction in
skeletal growth rates; for instance, one study found
growth anomalies in 95 % of
corals from the Mesoamerican Reef related to severe bleaching in 1998, though only a single core (of 92 collected) showed an anomaly due to a less severe event in 1995 [11].
The spatial pattern in
skeletal growth rates and partial mortality scars found in massive Porites sp. across the central and northern islands suggests that
corals subject to larger year - to - year fluctuations in maximum ocean temperature were more resistant to a 2004 warm - water event.