It is viewed as a key component of student learning, one that should be promoted as
a core classroom pedagogy to enrich students» love of learning and creativity.
Not exact matches
Changing the type of
pedagogy used in the
classroom and getting performance assessments instead of tests of knowledge are the real purpose of the Common
Core campaign.
Knowledge of how children and young people develop and learn, the principles of effective
pedagogy both within their own subject area and more generally, the implications of cognitive science for
classroom practice, and the features of good assessment also form part of a Chartered Teacher's
core knowledge base.
Common
Core top - down mandates and
pedagogy are ingrained and embedded into the
classroom and have infected all our public schools.
As an Assistant Professor of Practice, Cary led his graduate students through coursework focusing on
core pedagogy and best
classroom practices related to the teaching cycle,
classroom culture, cultural responsive curricula and instruction, and student growth and achievement.
In point of fact, the Common
Core is very much a blank canvas, and given the faddish
pedagogies endemic to American education, critics are hardly being unreasonable when they worry that the Common
Core may invite new - age goofiness into the
classroom.
The Report's central conclusion is that, although traditional legal
pedagogy is very effective in certain aspects, it overemphasizes legal theory and underemphasizes practical skills and professional development.5 By focusing on theory in the abstract setting of the
classroom, the Report argues, traditional legal education undermines the ethical foundations of law students and fails to prepare them adequately for actual practice.6 Traditional legal education is effective in teaching students to «think like lawyers,» but needs significant improvement in teaching them to function as ethical and responsible professionals after law school.7 As I will discuss in greater detail below, in general, the Report recommends «contextualizing» and «humanizing» legal education by integrating clinical and professional responsibility courses into the traditional
core curriculum.8 In this way, students will learn to think like lawyers in the concrete setting of actual cases and clients.9 The Report refers to pedagogical theories developed in other educational settings and argues that these theories show that teaching legal theory in the context of practice will not only better prepare students to be lawyers, it will also foster development of a greater and more deeply felt sense of ethical and professional identity.10