Are they focused on
the core things students need?
Not exact matches
One
thing seems clear: yoga
students — the brand's hardest -
core fans — have largely turned on Lululemon, says Stefanie Byrne, who co-owns the Ashtanga Yoga studio in Toronto with her husband.
Education Commissioner John B. King Jr. said during a televised forum in Buffalo that the state will continue to lead the way in implementing the Common
Core standards because «it's the right
thing for
students.»
Mr. King continued to defend New York's implementation of the Common
Core State Standards Initiative, which requires, among other
things, instructors to teach more non-fiction and rigorous math to
students at a younger age.
But Connelly changed
things, reducing English and math class sizes to an average of sixteen
students, hiring more teachers for
core subjects («I buy teachers — I don't buy test coordinators,» she states), and switching to mastery grading.
Among other
things, this authenticity addresses the call in the Common
Core State Standards for
students to «learn to appreciate that a key purpose of writing is to communicate clearly to an external, sometimes unfamiliar audience» and an emphasis in the Michigan second - grade social studies standards on the local community context.
So let's shift the conversation from the Common
Core to the common context and make
student apathy a
thing of the past.
As debate rages on about Common
Core and its implementation across the nation,
students are sitting in classrooms waiting for
things to change.
Its major finding was that most parents actually want pretty much the same
things from their schools: a solid
core curriculum in reading and math, an emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) education, and the development in
students of good study habits, strong critical thinking skills, and excellent verbal and written communication skills.
So, while I think they always work for college - and career - readiness for all
students, the Common
Core begins to make that more concrete, it begins to give that shape as to what kinds of
things that might mean in K - 12.
So, we wanted to have
things like common unit lesson plans, we also wanted to develop more of a team culture so that there's more sharing of ideas and more collaboration... But we also wanted to develop resources that could be used within the school and beyond the school, because a lot of our
students, we find when they leave us they don't return to any other education environment, they're sort of outside the education system... As part of our intervention we developed a suite of teaching materials around the Certificate I in
Core Skills for Employment and Training that can be used widely.
Assumption of positive intent is a choice to believe that, at our
core, most people want the same
things that we want for our
students.
It is indeed a good
thing that we have those other measures because it's true that the Common
Core era has failed to deliver on what many of us saw as one of its most valuable and important features: a platinum meter stick to be used to measure, monitor, and compare
student achievement, not just between states but also among districts, individual schools, even individual classrooms and children.
JP: One of the
things that NRC framework did was identify these
core ideas in these disciplinary areas — life science and physical science... And one of the
things that makes them a
core idea is that... you can start teaching
students about them early and develop increasing sophistication with respect to the understanding of that idea.
The Institute's CEO Jim Davies recommended that school communities create space for principals to get to the
core business — leading quality teaching and learning in their schools — and find ways the principal can put effort into the
things that account for
students in classrooms.
Petlak, for example, suggests using
student examples as a jumping - off point to talk about
things like Common
Core standards with parents.
I'm talking about
things like teacher licensing mandates, which researchers have long found do not improve teacher quality and traffic in disproven education fads (but do provide easy - access cash cows for state departments of education and teacher colleges since teachers are required to keep buying their products to maintain certification); ever - increasing testing and data - entry mandates; centralized curriculum mandates like Common
Core; centralized teacher evaluation and ratings systems; and the massive data entry required to document
things like
student behavior problems and special education services.
While the teachers, districts, and the folks in Sacramento all have the luxury of five years (as Michael Kirst likes to say) to figure
things out with Common
Core and the new wave of standardized tests, what about the 6 + million
students in school right now?
For one
thing, whether
students are identified as «below grade level» depends at least as much on the Common
Core tests — and associated cut scores — as it does on the standards themselves.
and reminding us the affective needs of the
students are just as important as the cognitive needs, are
things that are often left out of the discussion around the Common
Core.
When the California State Board of Education voted last week to once again delay holding schools accountable for their
students» performance on new Common
Core - aligned assessments, they had one
thing right: Schools still haven't effectively transitioned to the new standards and are not prepared to help all children meet them.
Things have reached a new low when a teachers» union is willing to abandon its
core responsibility and jeopardize
student safety for its own gain.»
We have successfully measured one
thing and that is compliance, otherwise the only
thing common
core states have in common is the labeling majority of their
students as failures.
A big part of Common
Core's true value is that our teachers will see textbooks and materials better aligned to curriculum, and
students coming to our state from another state will hopefully be able to transition in easier because they'll be learning the same
things.
The nine districts, known as California Office to Reform Education (
CORE), are still in the dark as to if and when they might be exempted from some of the more stringent requirements of the federal NCLB law that among other
things requires all
students to be proficient in English and math by 2014.
The report recommends that colleges add the results of Common
Core assessment tests to the measures by which they gauge
students» eligibility for admission and financial aid; that they help make sure primary and secondary schools teach the
things needed to succeed in higher education, and that the Common
Core tests measure them; and that schools of education show future teachers how to prepare their
students for college and careers.
Mathis acknowledges that debates will continue over the new Common
Core curriculum and assessments, but he believes that the new K — 12 shift toward measuring
students» college and career readiness beginning in grade 3 is the «right
thing do for
students.
Personalization is not «doing your own
thing» or altering the
core; it is the
core experience with a variety of options based on
student interest and competence.
experts, often from nonprofit groups, proclaim that all
students can follow the Common
Core State Standards — that every child can and should learn the same
things.
But
things become much clearer if we use resources like Achieve the
Core's Instructional Practice Guides to transform the idea of «text - dependent questions» into a concrete and observable priority such as, «Teachers ask text - dependent questions that address challenging areas of the text, and scaffold
students toward key understandings, leading to discussion and
student writing.»
Many of the foundation's
core ideas — which revolve, among other
things, around figuring out the best way to evaluate teachers and reward them for success in boosting
student achievement — have been embraced by the U.S. Department of Education and its secretary, Arne Duncan.
Like the other resources mentioned, it is also free, and for teachers, it includes a lot of classroom resources for
things like homework management and tracking
students progress with the common
core standards
«Wright hailed the state's work to adopt Common
Core standards, saying the standards are the best
thing for
students and teachers...» They are empirically superior and age - appropriate — developed by educators,»»
ALSO: Add New Fairfield to school districts engaging in the inappropriate and abusive «Sit and Stay» bullying policies, but West Haven comes off the list after deciding to do the right
thing and move
students who have been opted out of the Common
Core SBAC testing program out of the testing rooms
The fact that we have scored this resounding victory against Common
Core testing, before the mass flunking of our
students with an invalid test, is a wonderful
thing.
And when teachers use these kinds of
things, they can engage
students in the kinds of learning that absolutely reflect the common
core — that require analysis and conjecture and move away from rote learning.
He concluded that it was a good
thing to see small improvement in the second year of Common
Core testing, but that it's going to be a «hard, slow slog» to get the majority of
students to the proficient level with only about a third hitting that threshold now.
So to me, the value of the Common
Core State Standards — which encourages
students to do precisely those
things — is crystal clear.
Thus I understand and sympathize if beleaguered teachers view Common
Core State Standards (CCSS) as just one more damn
thing imposed on them from on high, interposed between them and their
students.
The Common
Core encourages
things like teacher websites and blogging instruction for elementary school
students.
And accomplish these
things in part through providing
students with a strong education in their
core legal duties as lawyers.