For different reasons, sugar subsidies, ethanol subsidies,
corn and wheat subsidies, really just about any farm subsidies that aren't based on preventing soil erosion.
Not exact matches
«It's only products that have
wheat and corn in them in the supermarket that get any
subsidies,» said Dooley, a farm owner
and longtime member of the House Agriculture Committee.
The United States government in its wisdom chose to give agricultural
subsidies to
wheat,
corn,
and soybeans, thus reducing the price of the most toxic food crops.
As highlighted in the documentary Food Inc., the amount of money that goes toward the overproduction of
corn, soy
and other
subsidies like
wheat could be diverted to the production of fruits, vegetables
and grass - fed livestock, providing that budget redistribution
and subsequent actions were handled carefully.
I am frustrated by any
subsidy that supports over-used, overly - processed foods (
wheat,
corn, soy
and cotton mainly) while ignoring the foods people need to eat to be HEALTHY — vegetables
and fruit!
Corn is our most lavishly subsidized food crop, by a wide margin; it drew more in
subsidies over that period than
wheat ($ 22 billion), soybeans ($ 14 billion),
and rice ($ 11 billion)-- combined.
In contrast, the producers of
corn, soybeans,
wheat and cotton continue to get $ 20 billion or so a year in farm
subsidies.