Comment from Morna McDermott: How can we escape the trap that high stakes testing both serves corporate interest like Pearson at the expense of children's real learning while acknowledging that tests are being used to shut down public community schools for
corporate model charter schools that have proven to be no better than the schools they replaced?
Not exact matches
The influence that these private philanthropists exercise is now being felt in
school districts from coast to coast and manifests itself in the policies favored by the donors: the introduction of a
corporate model in
school administration, merit pay for teachers, giving local
schools greater autonomy from their respective districts and the opening of more
charter schools.
Limiting federally - mandated
school improvement
models to a narrow set of strategies, including
charter schools and privatization, which are favored by
corporate reformers but which have had little verified success
While early
charter schools, established under a
model introduced by Albert Shanker in the 1990s, were designed to give educators on the ground floor more administrative autonomy, modern
charters are run (and, in part, funded) by increasingly diverse groups, from
corporate behemoths, to hedge funds, to dynamic and independent taste - makers (Cohen 2015).