Sentences with phrase «correct decisions in case»

A warehouse manager must be a good leader with the ability to organize, motivate the staff, and take quick and correct decisions in case of problems.

Not exact matches

Again, the court's errors in such cases are difficult to correct, whereas leaving decisions to various legislatures allows for varying solutions and ongoing debate: states can serve as «laboratories of experiment,» in the words of Justice Louis Brandeis.

as my own church commmunity has been hit with the blow of several key members leaving over a disagreement, and i'd like to say, an issue of «churchism» vs. «non-churchism», i feel keenly the decision you have made in your case is a correct one.

According to the joint statement, the so - called «high - def TV» Decision played no role in Woods» case and «should not be viewed as a general precedent for relaxing or ignoring a competitor's essential obligation under the Rules to return a correct scorecard.»

We are hugely disappointed by HMRC's decision to prioritise the maximisation of expenditure savings over ensuring the processes were fair to claimants, proportionate and driven towards ensuring the correct decision was made in each case.

The research team discovered that employees were more likely to accept the manner in which the layoff interview was conducted and the decision itself if the messenger had received prior training than in those cases in which notification of termination was simply communicated to employees in a formally correct way.

At least since the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954, this has been interpreted to give the federal government the power to intervene in cases of legally sanctioned discrimination, like the segregation of public schools across the country; to mandate equal access to education for students with disabilities; and, according to some arguments, to correct for persistently unequal access to resources across states and districts of different income levels.

He said ministers only got involved in the most important decisions and the GCSE English row was an «exceptional case, on which we were able to respond quickly and decisively to correct an injustice to learners in Wales».

Merchants can assert they were correct in a dispute, in which case the card processing company makes a decision.

In which case, you as an Instructor or Divemaster need to be able to explain or correct decisions made about the environment.

These observations are correct in a revealing way but again letting instinctual fear and revulsion take the place of rational thought, emotional instincts and fear are once again leading us into decisions that will ultimately be proved to be a case of self - inflicted blindness and wasted efforts typical of this kind of stupidity.

Citing Walsh v. Mobil, 2008 ABCA 268 (CanLII) at 43, the Court of Appeal noted its role involved determining whether the reviewing judge's decision (in this case the decision of Topolniski J.C.Q.B.A. with respect to the Chief Commissioner's decision) chose and applied the correct standard of review.

When legal academe instead chooses to evaluate how judges have conformed to the academics» personal opinions — and worse, to their belief systems — as I have seen happen in critical discussions among law professors of the Wagar case and, god help us, of the very legally correct Ghomeshi decision as if it were regrettable, it is legal academe that is being arrogant, not the judges in question.

Neither will automation mean an end to litigation, Sir Geoffrey Vos, chancellor of the High Court, said: predictions will never be 100 % correct — and in any case decisions about whether to pursue a case are not always taken by entirely rational people.

The Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act regulates how background checks must be conducted and, in some cases, commands employers to give a job applicant an opportunity to correct potential screening mistakes before a final hiring decision is made.

One that irks me, as often as not, is the continued refusal of some judges in this province to understand that statute, common law, and principle, in cases where a defendant's liability is proportional (several, only) not solidary (i.e. joint), requires them, in order to get make the correct decision — the correct decision is important, right?

While I agree that the Presiding Officer's decision was correct in law and within a range of reasonable outcomes, this case raises concern that the Court's broad application of the self - incrimination immunity exception to one class may have adverse effects on the public.

The EAT stated the correct test in a pregnancy discrimination and automatic unfair dismissal case was whether the decision to dismiss had been because of the pregnancy.

It goes without saying that even though Ferreira de Silva case could be seen as a more lenient approach towards the relaxing of the acte clair doctrine [8] the CJEU will always strive for uniform and correct interpretation of EU law in order to avoid divergences in judicial decisions as well as different and conflicting application of EU law.

I read the parsimony language as a recognition by Congress that sentencing is a uniquely personal moment, both for judges and for defendants, and as a concession that it is therefore a moment where the usual policy - making branches should yield some of their policy authority to the judge familiar with the facts of the case, and that the judge should be guided in this policy decision by the principle that the lowest sentence serving the requirements of sentencing is the correct one.

The court / tribunal is in a position to quickly post high - profile cases, correct a decision or withdraw an erroneously published one.

While wrong — including over-cautious and incautious — legal advice clearly could result in an unlawful decision, the advice given in this case was correct.

These were the decisions in the celebrated Sportelli litigation, probably the most important case on valuation and enfranchisement since 1967; another decision that establishes that a head lease can be a qualifying lease for flat lease extension purposes; a decision on the scope of the landlord's right to resist claims where the current lease has less than five years to run and the landlord needs possession in order to redevelop and yet another decision on the correct approach to be taken in determining whether a building is a house or not.

The Court of Appeal did not have to determine what that amount would be in this case as the parties had settled and the Court's decision was only with respect to the correct interpretation of the provisions in the SLRA.

That is contrary to the requirement of misrepresentation, and the Court of Appeal agreed with the view of Elias P that the decision in that case was correct on its facts, but this part of the reasoning was too broad to be acceptable.

This aspect was not subsequently addressed in the High Court's ruling in the Wik case, and the first instance decision on mineral rights has since been judicially doubted because of subsequent High Court rulings about government «ownership» of resources: Justice North in the (minority of) the full Federal Court appeal decision in Ward - v - Western Australia observed of the Federal Court decision in Wik that «the conclusion that the mining legislation in Queensland conferred full beneficial ownership on the crown sufficient to extinguish native title can not be regarded as correct» (2000) 170 ALR 159 at para 843.

While a number of researchers purport to have found relitigation rates lower following mediated decisions, or (primarily in early studies) in joint custody arrangements, not one of these studies appears to have corrected for (in the first case) the reality that negotiated agreements are not as legally amenable to modification as court orders, or (in both cases) that couples who achieved accord in mediation, as well as those who voluntarily chose early joint custody arrangements were already relatively more amicable couples.

But, if I am correct, what comes from the Quebec legal system vis a vis any kind of decision in this case really has no bearing upon the rest of the country, wherein, as Carolyne said, provincial regulations and rules, even enacted under English Common Law, may fly in the face of one another.