Even though some of these unorthodox ways of trying to
correct judicial errors may go in our favor, the overall disruption of the system is too great to be allowed.
Not exact matches
Ms. Raczynska failed to name the
correct party on her application for
judicial review, and failed to repair this
error or serve the Professional Corporation in the stipulated time frame (at paras 4, 5 citing Leon's Furniture Limited v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 2011 ABCA 94).
If the court agrees with the findings of the statutory decision - maker the impugned decision survives
judicial review, but if the court disagrees with the findings then the impugned decision is set aside or varied to
correct the
error.
The concept of jurisdictional
error, with its teaching that on some matters an administrative decision - maker must be
correct or face
judicial intervention, has usually been at the eye of the storm.
We are at a loss to understand upon what principle of law, applicable to appellate jurisdiction, it can be supposed that this court has not
judicial authority to
correct the last - mentioned
error because they had before
corrected the former, or by what process of reasoning it can be made out that the
error of an inferior court in actually pronouncing judgment for one of the parties in a case in which it had no jurisdiction can not be looked into or
corrected by this court because we have decided a similar question presented in the pleadings.