Not exact matches
In taking this
position, Spitzer has agreed purely
scientific approach to the limitations of Spitzer's study and would be to conduct more rigorous outcome findings, something that he along with others have been calling for all along Even the APA Report on
correct Responses to Orient.
So who's going to sponsor a full - page ad stating the mainstream
scientific position /
correcting those misleading statements, signed by hundreds of ACTUAL CLIMATOLOGISTS?
You need to consider the possibility that Skeptical Science, and all those advocating for the mainstream
scientific position, aren't so much partisan as arguing for a
scientific position which they believe to be
correct.
In particular, we will show how political bodies act to control
scientific institutions, how scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically
correct positions, and how opposition to these
positions is disposed of.
nobody is claiming that the existence of a consensus on a
scientific question is in any way proof that the mainstream
position is
correct, that is a straw man.
I have written a number of times about climate science and post-modernism, where taking the politically
correct position and pushing for the «right» government actions is more important than fact - based analysis or the
scientific method.