Please make sure to choose
the correct technical term in the box «offer type» in the Application Portal:
As to the negotiation between my artist and writer bits («bits» is
the correct technical term I'm sure), usually I've found them to be pretty closely intertwined and sympathetic to each other.
Not exact matches
Skeptical101 # 14 My interpretation and synopsis of the considerable
technical detail and references provided by Tom Curtis # 15 & One Planet # 16, # 17 is that your»... not use it as an argument to support AGW» is
correct if used over periods in which short
term natural variability influences the trend strongly (< 30 years was mentioned sometimes) and, in particular, the models are not able to predict the ENSO conditions at all well.
As a question put to leading climate scientist Phil Jones it demonstrates that whoever composed that particular question knew that «statistically - significant «is a
technical term requiring a technically
correct answer, knew that the period was too short to allow an unequivocal answer, knew that the general public would equate «no statistically significant global warming» with no real warming.