Those believing that 30 or 50 stations is a solution better rethink — correct figure needs to be over 100 000 and that still wouldn't present
a correct view of reality.
How are we to know that process philosophy provides us with
a correct view of reality?
Not exact matches
It is typically thought that if two traditions hold different
views of ultimate
reality, they can not both be
correct.
Briefly reiterated, Whitehead's
view is that the basic unit
of reality is an actual entity which may be conceived as»... a subject presiding over its own immediacy of becoming...» (Process and Reality, Corrected Editi
reality is an actual entity which may be conceived as»... a subject presiding over its own immediacy
of becoming...» (Process and
Reality, Corrected Editi
Reality,
Corrected Edition, ed.
But that genuine scientific work can increase the likelihood that certain formulations are applicable to aspects
of the real world, that certain predictions are
correct, and that some ways
of viewing reality are more comprehensively accurate than others — that we must believe if we are to continue with the scientific enterprise at all.
I also think that — while some may
view this argument through a «is the poster being politically
correct» lens — the
reality (IMO) is that there is still rampant sexism practiced in this country, and until there is less
of it I will always
view phrases like the above one through that lens.
Thus if an X-ray triggers the detector, the quantum duplicate
of the mirror must have disappeared, and Penrose's
view of reality must be
correct.