Not exact matches
First, it would be consistent with Whitehead's own methodology, in this
way to make God the chief exemplar for the understanding
of process everywhere else in the world, Secondly, and more importantly, it might help to
correct the unfortunate tendency even among Whiteheadians subconsciously to regard actual entities as atoms, minisubstances which are, so to
speak, the building blocks
of the world process.
Jesus said repent which means you pay for your own sins, and as Jesus
spoke of in the Parable
of the Lost Coin, doing work like cleaning and seeking diligently is all a part
of repentance... Also, note that
correcting something as small as a lost coin shows Jesus's views on repentance and sins (devations from «the
way, the truth, and the life — economic health
of life for a lost coin).
Speaking of toddlers, they give a good clue
of the
correct way to use the loo: in a natural squatting position.
If there is a bias toward one «
correct»
way of speaking, well, they want their students to learn it.
When someone takes it upon themselves to «
speak for everyone», in a certain linear kind
of way, it sometimes becomes necessary to
correct them.
So in a nutshell and roughly
speaking, the grand yet unintentional experiment we're running today has already been performed albeit w / the surrogate input
of orbital forcing (if that's the
correct way to put it) to induce the disappearance
of the WAIS.