Sentences with phrase «correct words per minute»

The number of correct words per minute from the passage is the oral reading fluency score.

Not exact matches

One analogy for these results might be the question of who can type a paragraph «better»: a 16 - year - old who glides along at 60 words per minute but then has to double - back to correct a number of mistakes or a 70 - year - old who strikes keys at only 40 words per minute but spends less time fixing errors.

*** Includes 129 original reading passages and comprehension questions *** *** Includes 30 fluency passages *** *** Includes 11 Reading Posters *** - character, setting, realism and fantasy, main idea and details, cause and effect, author's purpose, compare and contrast, sequence, plot, theme, and drawing conclusions *** Includes four level charts for teachers, parents, or students, so that they can keep track of their progress *** *** Includes a roster - words correct per minute for each student / child for fall / winter / spring *** Skills addressed in this resource: # 1 - think and search # 2 - author and me # 3 - analyze text structure # 4 - identify setting # 5 - identify character # 6 - identify plot # 7 - make and confirm predictions # 8 - cause and effect # 9 - compare and contrast # 10 - retell # 11 - classify and categorize # 12 - alliteration # 13 - rhyme and rhythmic patterns # 14 - onomatopoeia # 15 - similes # 16 - repetition and word choice # 17 - sensory language # 18 - study skills # 19 - text features # 20 - genres This is GREAT practice for testing while also providing a lot of fluency practice!

*** Includes four level charts for teachers, parents, or students, so that they can keep track of their progress *** *** Includes a roster - words correct per minute for each student / child for fall / winter / spring *** The passages and comprehension questions in this packet are designed to help you meet both your specific English / Language Arts standards and learning expectations as well as those recommended by the Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSS).

For our final analysis, we conducted a stepwise regression in which the most powerful school level (systematic internal assessment and parent links) and classroom level (time in small - group instruction and time in independent reading) variables were simultaneously regressed on our most robust outcome measure, fluency as indexed by words correct per minute on a grade level passage.

Composite z - score on three project reading measures: spring reading words residual, spring retelling at reading level residual, and spring words - correct - per - minute residual 2.

In the fall (for grades 2 — 3) and spring (grades 1 — 3) students were assessed on words correct per minute on a grade level passage, retelling on an instructional level passage, and a word list (again comprised of common sight words and some words with predictable spellings).

This video explains how to conduct a one - minute timing to assess a student's reading fluency (words correct per minute).

Under the «Fall» and «Spring» columns are the students» scores (number of words read correct per minute) for those benchmark seasons.

The students» rates of improvement are listed under the column titled «Growth,» which indicates how many words read correct per minute the student gained from fall to spring per week.

For every 10 % increase in the coding of coaching in word recognition strategies, students» fluency score increased by 8.9 words correct per minute on average.

If we note that students increased their scores by an average of 20 words correct per minute per year (see Table 7) and that school scores on the collaborative leadership scale ranged from 1.1 to 1.9 with a mean of 1.7 (out of a high score of 3), then we can surmise that, at least in principle, a school gaining one additional point on the collaborative leadership scale could make up a year's worth of fluency performance.

For every 10 % increase in the coding of higher - level questioning, students» fluency scores increased by an average of 8.8 words correct per minute.

Grade 1 was analyzed separately from grades 2 - 3 since different fall scores (e.g., word dictation in grade 1 versus words correct per minute, Gates comprehension, or writing score in grades 2 - 3) were used as explanatory variables in the analyses.

Assessments included a standardized reading comprehension test (grades 1 - 6) as well as tests considering letter - name knowledge (K - 1), rhyme (K - 1), phonemic awareness (K - 1), word dictation (K - 1), concepts of print (K - 1), fluency (words correct per minute; Deno, 1985)(1 - 6), and writing (responding to a common prompt)(1 - 6).

For every 10 % increase in the coding of active responding, students» fluency score increase on average by 5.4 words correct per minute.

Words correct per minute on passage from Johns (1997).

For every 10 % increase in the coding of small - group instruction, students» fluency score increased by an average of 2.1 words correct per minute.

In the fall, children in grades 2 - 6 were individually assessed on fluency (words correct per minute) based on their reading of a BRI passage (Johns, 1997) that was one grade level below their grade placement.

For every 10 % increase in the coding of phonics instruction, students» fluency score decreased by 3.0 words correct per minute on average.

Across all schools, the mean school fluency score was 104.5 words correct per minute.

For every 10 % increase in the coding of a teacher - directed stance, students» fluency score decreased by a mean of 4.0 words correct per minute.

* WCPM = Words Correct Per Minute ** Average weekly improvement is the average words per week growth you can expect from a stuWords Correct Per Minute ** Average weekly improvement is the average words per week growth you can expect from a studePer Minute ** Average weekly improvement is the average words per week growth you can expect from a stuwords per week growth you can expect from a studeper week growth you can expect from a student.

Some kids with fluency problems really struggle with phonics and their low words correct per minute rates may be due to phonics difficulties.

«Fluency measures such as words correct per minute has been shown, in both theoretical and empirical research, to serve as an accurate and powerful indicator of overall reading competence, especially in its strong correlation with comprehension.»

To determine if a student needs a reading fluency intervention, compare his or her average words - correct - per - minute (wcpm) score from two or three unpracticed readings of grade - level assessment passages to oral reading fluency norms, such as the Hasbrouck - Tindal Oral Reading Fluency Norms.

The software automatically calculates the student's words - correct - per - minute (wcpm) score on each passage and averages the scores.

For example, by the end of first grade we want all children to read at least 40 words correct per minute on a first grade reading passage and demonstrate a level of reading comprehension that is commensurate with this level of fluency which on the DRA is a Level 18 or higher.

An individual report for each student provides the student's average words - correct - per - minute (wcpm) score and general recommendations based on the student's results.

CAREER HIGHLIGHTS • Over five years of experience in different data entry capacities • Proven ability to type 55 words per minute • Excellent verbal and written communication skills • Highly experienced in processing customer information and ensuring completion within deadlines • Proofreads information to process it correctly • Correctly locates and corrects data entry errors • Proficient in performing related administrative tasks