Not exact matches
On top of it, you have trolls
like yourselff posting under many different names, so you
data is
corrupted by the anonymity of a blog... again... wild speculation and jump to conclusion... find something more interesting troll, you bore me.
One way to weed
corrupted data out of a high - dimensional
data set is to take 2 - D cross sections of the graph of the
data and see whether they look
like Gaussian distributions.
Like modders, PC gamers are rabidly enthusiastic about pulling apart save games and
data files, fiddling therein, and finding ingenious ways to cheat or fix
corrupted files.
In my current incarnation as a radiation engineer, I often find issues with electronics and rush to the satellite design engineer and say, «Did you know...» More often than not, they say, «Yeah, and this is what we did to mitigate that...» Orbiting observatories
like Hubble are a devils playground for radiation effects, which can
corrupt data and cause systematic drifts over time as radiation dose mounts.
------------------------------------ And here's what the proxies vs. the highly adjusted instrumental
data that have been hopelessly
corrupted by removing thousands of rural stations and keeping urban stations, moving rural sites to airports, «mostly made up» SH sea surface temperatures, cooling down the 1930s and 1940s artificially to remove 0.5 C from the early 20th century warming... look
like.
That's what climate alarmists and people
like you do juggle the facts,
corrupt the
data to suit your hypothesis.
Not to mention the fact that sometimes
data packets may be lost, as well as can become
corrupt (
like any other
data sent wirelessly) or bluetooth can be messed up by plain interference especially in the 2.4 GHz frequency (the same wavelength that wi - fi uses).