If Wallis really said «The most
corrupt government spending is military spending,....
«The most
corrupt government spending is military spending,» Wallis said.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign
Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24)
spending by the U.S. and other
governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign
government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Usyk represents Ukraine internationally, and
spends time with the ATO soldiers; I suspect that he'd have a good chance winning a public showdown with some
corrupt government ministry.
First there are three critical problems with the structure of our economy - the dominance of
government spending on recurrent expenses of a public service which employs only a small percentage of Nigerians; the dominance of our oil and gas sector (and until recently power) by an inefficient and
corrupt public sector; and the structure of our financial sector which excludes Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises from financing and has been unable to provide mortgages and housing for the middle class.
«Consequently, the Buhari
government has
spent inordinate time cleaning the rot and plugging the holes in the
corrupt system they institutionalised as their strategic policy and national direction.
The newest entrant into the New York governor's race casts himself as an angry reformer who wants to tear down the walls of state
government, slash
spending, impose a cap on taxes and stamp out
corrupt interests.
In the flier, Braunstein pledges to reform Albany by fighting for greater transparency in state
government, ridding the state Legislature of «
corrupt politicians,» reining in special interests and stopping «reckless
government spending.»
He's vowed not to accept contributions «because the campaign finance system is so
corrupt» and wants to create a website so people can access
government spending data «down to the nickel.»
That he's mad as hell at wasteful
government spending and the
corrupt political Establishment — but that his upstate real - estate company takes full advantage of state tax breaks.
More
corrupt states
spent more on high wages, which benefit
government employees.
In addition to
spending more than expected,
corrupt states
spent more on
government activities and services that are susceptible to manipulation for private gain and less on other activities.
State
government time and time again has backed into an education funding amount and then
corrupted the Education Cost Sharing (ECS) formula and other funding programs to deliver an agreed upon
spending amount.
State
government time and time again has backed into an education funding amount and then
corrupted the Education Cost Sharing (ECS) formula and other funding programs to deliver a target
spending amount.
Since the 1980s they have influenced
governments to
spend billions in public funds and subsidies to advance its
corrupt science, along with subsidizing a massive building program of solar panels and wind turbines providing so little electricity it actually has endangered lives in Europe and threatens the integrity of the U.S. electrical grid.
Governments * are doing * nothing that could possibly affect total CO2 emissions, true, but the public has already
spent over the many years, trillion dollars paying for all kinds of idiotic activity which is ** said ** by
corrupt / stupid / evil / greedy / fraudent
government policy makers to be done for the purpose of reducing CO2 emissions.
Type III & IV
spending are most
corrupting (of both beneficiaries and spenders)-- e.g.
government grant climate science.