Pt 7, «Cancerous Greenpeace / Desmogblog / Gelbspan Stuff»: What's detailed in this post is how Dave Rado's Ofcom complaint is first and foremost pushing absolutely nothing more
than guilt - by - association «evidence» to indict skeptic climate scientists of industry - funded
corruption, and secondly, how Rado, much like any
other prominent accuser, is enslaved to an accusation narrative which ultimately relies on
sources who repeat material which inevitably traces back to Ross Gelbspan and the clique of enviro - activists surrounding him when he and they got the first real media traction for the accusation.